The Inverted-U Under Scrutiny: A Meta-Analytic Test of the Yerkes–Dodson Law Across Cognitive Domains

The Yerkes–Dodson law — the claim that performance relates to arousal as an inverted U — is among the most cited principles in psychology. We test the claim by conducting an umbrella review of 36 meta-analyses and systematic reviews (covering over 1,200 primary experiments) on the relationship between acute stress, cortisol, or physiological arousal and cognitive performance. We then identified 40 primary experiments that manipulated arousal at three or more intensity levels and compared the fit of linear, quadratic, and null models using AICc. The quadratic model was preferred in 11 of 40 cases, concentrated almost entirely in working memory tasks under pharmacological cortisol manipulation (48% of pharmacological experiments vs. 5% of psychological-stress experiments). Episodic memory retrieval showed monotone impairment (d = −0.20 to −0.49). Executive control showed selective impairment: cognitive flexibility and cognitive inhibition declined while response inhibition improved (Shields et al., 2016, k = 51). Decision-making shifted toward reward-seeking (d = 0.17; Starcke & Brand, 2016, k = 32). Two neurobiological mechanisms account for the domain specificity: the mineralocorticoid–glucocorticoid receptor (MR/GR) occupancy balance produces a genuine inverted-U for cortisol acting on prefrontal working-memory circuits (confirmed by receptor-blockade studies: Rimmele et al., 2012; Deuter et al., 2024), while catecholaminergic modulation of neural gain via locus coeruleus–norepinephrine phasic/tonic modes (Aston-Jones & Cohen, 2005) produces monotone facilitation in subcortical systems. Critical moderators include sex (Liu et al., 2017, k = 34), hormonal contraceptive use (Jentsch et al., 2022), age (Lee et al., 2018), and timing relative to cognitive process (Shields et al., 2017, k = 113). None are captured by the Yerkes–Dodson framework. We propose replacing the broad law with a domain-specific, mechanism-grounded framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22238054
Primary Topic
Stress Responses and Cortisol
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

The Inverted-U Under Scrutiny: A Meta-Analytic Test of the Yerkes–Dodson Law Across Cognitive Domains

Denis O. Drobyshev, Dmitry A. Maksimov
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Stress Responses and Cortisol
preprint

The Inverted-U Under Scrutiny: A Meta-Analytic Test of the Yerkes–Dodson Law Across Cognitive Domains

Denis O. Drobyshev, Dmitry A. Maksimov
preprint en

Abstract

The Yerkes–Dodson law — the claim that performance relates to arousal as an inverted U — is among the most cited principles in psychology. We test the claim by conducting an umbrella review of 36 meta-analyses and systematic reviews (covering over 1,200 primary experiments) on the relationship between acute stress, cortisol, or physiological arousal and cognitive performance. We then identified 40 primary experiments that manipulated arousal at three or more intensity levels and compared the fit of linear, quadratic, and null models using AICc. The quadratic model was preferred in 11 of 40 cases, concentrated almost entirely in working memory tasks under pharmacological cortisol manipulation (48% of pharmacological experiments vs. 5% of psychological-stress experiments). Episodic memory retrieval showed monotone impairment (d = −0.20 to −0.49). Executive control showed selective impairment: cognitive flexibility and cognitive inhibition declined while response inhibition improved (Shields et al., 2016, k = 51). Decision-making shifted toward reward-seeking (d = 0.17; Starcke & Brand, 2016, k = 32). Two neurobiological mechanisms account for the domain specificity: the mineralocorticoid–glucocorticoid receptor (MR/GR) occupancy balance produces a genuine inverted-U for cortisol acting on prefrontal working-memory circuits (confirmed by receptor-blockade studies: Rimmele et al., 2012; Deuter et al., 2024), while catecholaminergic modulation of neural gain via locus coeruleus–norepinephrine phasic/tonic modes (Aston-Jones & Cohen, 2005) produces monotone facilitation in subcortical systems. Critical moderators include sex (Liu et al., 2017, k = 34), hormonal contraceptive use (Jentsch et al., 2022), age (Lee et al., 2018), and timing relative to cognitive process (Shields et al., 2017, k = 113). None are captured by the Yerkes–Dodson framework. We propose replacing the broad law with a domain-specific, mechanism-grounded framework.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Independence Community College (US), Energy Industries of Ohio (US), Moscow State University of Geodesy and Cartography (RU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Stress Responses and Cortisol
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.