Person‐Reported and Continuous Glucose Monitoring ( CGM ) Recorded Hypoglycaemia in People With Insulin‐Treated Type 2 Diabetes and Mild to Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease; Post Hoc Analysis From the Hypo‐ METRICS Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be at increased risk of iatrogenic hypoglycaemia. We compared rates of sensor-detected (SDH) and person-reported hypoglycaemia (PRH) in people with insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes (T2D) with and without CKD in the Hypo-METRICS study. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Insulin-treated T2D patients with > 1 hypoglycaemic episode within the last 3 months wore a blinded continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and recorded PRH on the bespoke Hypo-METRICS app for 10 weeks. SDH was defined as per consensus guidelines. The participants were grouped based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), that is CKD 1 (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min; n = 117), CKD 2 (eGFR 60-89 mL/min; n = 140), and CKD 3 (eGFR 30-59 mL/min; n = 56). We used descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests, and a negative binomial models to control for confounders. RESULTS: In total, 313 participants with T2DM were included. Median age increased with declining eGFR (p < 0.001). Median (IQR) events per week for SDH < 3.9 mmol/L were 1.72 (0.66-3.43) in CKD 1, 2.12 (0.85-4.55) in CKD 2, and 2.22 (1.09-4.57) in CKD 3 (p = 0.12). For SDH < 3.0 mmol/L, these rates were 0.20 (0.00-0.50), 0.21 (0.10-0.61), and 0.20 (0.00-0.71), respectively (p = 0.88). PRH events had medians of 1.05 (0.40-2.12), 1.31 (0.61-2.42), and 1.28 (0.68-2.25) for CKD 1, CKD 2, and CKD 3 (p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: In people with insulin-treated T2DM and CKD stages 2 or 3, the rates of SDH and PRH do not significantly differ from those in people without CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTRials.gov: NCT04304963.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.71247
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Person‐Reported and Continuous Glucose Monitoring ( CGM ) Recorded Hypoglycaemia in People With Insulin‐Treated Type 2 Diabetes and Mild to Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease; Post Hoc Analysis From the Hypo‐ METRICS Study

Ulrik Pedersen‐Bjergaard, Namam Ali, Julia Katharina Mader, Éric Renard et al.
Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Person‐Reported and Continuous Glucose Monitoring ( CGM ) Recorded Hypoglycaemia in People With Insulin‐Treated Type 2 Diabetes and Mild to Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease; Post Hoc Analysis From the Hypo‐ METRICS Study

Ulrik Pedersen‐Bjergaard, Namam Ali, Julia Katharina Mader, Éric Renard, Julie Maria Bøggild Brøsen, Rory J. McCrimmon, Simon Heller, Mark L. Evans, Gilberte Martine‐Edith, Daniel Malmsiø, Natalie Zaremba, Patrick Divilly, Bastiaan de Galan, Pratik Choudhary, Allan A. Vaag
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People with diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CKD) may be at increased risk of iatrogenic hypoglycaemia. We compared rates of sensor-detected (SDH) and person-reported hypoglycaemia (PRH) in people with insulin-treated Type 2 diabetes (T2D) with and without CKD in the Hypo-METRICS study. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Insulin-treated T2D patients with > 1 hypoglycaemic episode within the last 3 months wore a blinded continuous glucose monitor (CGM) and recorded PRH on the bespoke Hypo-METRICS app for 10 weeks. SDH was defined as per consensus guidelines. The participants were grouped based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), that is CKD 1 (eGFR ≥ 90 mL/min; n = 117), CKD 2 (eGFR 60-89 mL/min; n = 140), and CKD 3 (eGFR 30-59 mL/min; n = 56). We used descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests, and a negative binomial models to control for confounders. RESULTS: In total, 313 participants with T2DM were included. Median age increased with declining eGFR (p < 0.001). Median (IQR) events per week for SDH < 3.9 mmol/L were 1.72 (0.66-3.43) in CKD 1, 2.12 (0.85-4.55) in CKD 2, and 2.22 (1.09-4.57) in CKD 3 (p = 0.12). For SDH < 3.0 mmol/L, these rates were 0.20 (0.00-0.50), 0.21 (0.10-0.61), and 0.20 (0.00-0.71), respectively (p = 0.88). PRH events had medians of 1.05 (0.40-2.12), 1.31 (0.61-2.42), and 1.28 (0.68-2.25) for CKD 1, CKD 2, and CKD 3 (p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: In people with insulin-treated T2DM and CKD stages 2 or 3, the rates of SDH and PRH do not significantly differ from those in people without CKD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTRials.gov: NCT04304963.

Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
University of Copenhagen (DK), Steno Diabetes Centers (DK), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), University of Leicester (GB), University of Dundee (GB), King's College London (GB), Université de Montpellier (FR), Medical University of Graz (AT), University of Cambridge (GB), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Maastricht University (NL), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier (FR), St. Vincent's University Hospital (IE), King's College School (GB), University of Sheffield (GB)
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International, Eli Lilly and Company, Sanofi, Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, University of Dundee, European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, European Commission, Radboud Universiteit, Novo Nordisk, Université de Montpellier, Abbott Diabetes Care, Menzies Centre for Australian Studies, King's College London, University of London
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.