Review of Accountability Across Procurement, Energy Performance Contracting, and Measurement and Verification in Public Building Decarbonization

Background: Public building decarbonization is accountable only when procurement requirements remain traceable through contractual obligations and post-implementation verification. Objective: This review mapped that chain across procurement and life-cycle appraisal (Stage A), energy performance contracting and energy service company arrangements (Stage B), and measurement and verification (Stage C). Methods: Scopus and Web of Science searches were executed with a broad audit range, while the final primary eligibility window was restricted to English-language publications from 2020 through to 13 August 2026. Citation and targeted methods supplemented the database stream, and two authors verified full-text eligibility, study family assignments, stage codes, principal outcomes, and candidate complete chains. Results: Thirty-five reports representing 33 study families were included in the final synthesis. Stages A, B, and C were reported by 15, 17, and 11 families, respectively. One family contained all three stages and was also the sole strict same-project chain (3.0%); it reported performance-linked settlement. Twenty-two families were model- or method-prospective, four were contract-, programme-, or document-based, six reported measured or adjusted operational evidence, and one reported an externally verified programme. Conclusions: The current literature shows substantial technical and contractual activity but limited same-case continuity. PBDAF is, therefore, presented solely as a review-derived conceptual reporting proposal for standardized reporting and prospective testing; it is not a validated scoring or diagnostic instrument.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16173484
Primary Topic
Life Cycle Costing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review of Accountability Across Procurement, Energy Performance Contracting, and Measurement and Verification in Public Building Decarbonization

Berkay Gür, Haluk Yaman
Buildings
Life Cycle Costing Analysis
article

Review of Accountability Across Procurement, Energy Performance Contracting, and Measurement and Verification in Public Building Decarbonization

Berkay Gür, Haluk Yaman
article en

Abstract

Background: Public building decarbonization is accountable only when procurement requirements remain traceable through contractual obligations and post-implementation verification. Objective: This review mapped that chain across procurement and life-cycle appraisal (Stage A), energy performance contracting and energy service company arrangements (Stage B), and measurement and verification (Stage C). Methods: Scopus and Web of Science searches were executed with a broad audit range, while the final primary eligibility window was restricted to English-language publications from 2020 through to 13 August 2026. Citation and targeted methods supplemented the database stream, and two authors verified full-text eligibility, study family assignments, stage codes, principal outcomes, and candidate complete chains. Results: Thirty-five reports representing 33 study families were included in the final synthesis. Stages A, B, and C were reported by 15, 17, and 11 families, respectively. One family contained all three stages and was also the sole strict same-project chain (3.0%); it reported performance-linked settlement. Twenty-two families were model- or method-prospective, four were contract-, programme-, or document-based, six reported measured or adjusted operational evidence, and one reported an externally verified programme. Conclusions: The current literature shows substantial technical and contractual activity but limited same-case continuity. PBDAF is, therefore, presented solely as a review-derived conceptual reporting proposal for standardized reporting and prospective testing; it is not a validated scoring or diagnostic instrument.

BuildingsVol. 16(17)
University of Turku (FI)
Firat Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Life Cycle Costing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.