The two-body problem in interpersonal distance:A process model of social space regulation in psychopathology

Interpersonal distance (IPD), the physical proximity individuals maintain during face-to-face interaction, is disrupted across a range of disorders involving distorted or threat-biased body representation, from eating disorders to social anxiety and schizophrenia. The dominant mechanistic account links this disruption to peripersonal space (PPS), modeling IPD as the output of the perceiver's own defensive boundary. This account is egocentric: it treats the approaching person as a source of threat rather than as a body whose size, kinematics, and spatial requirements must themselves be represented. IPD regulation, however, is a two-body problem that no current single-body model addresses. Drawing on recent evidence that the spatial properties of another person's body enter the same sensorimotor system that codes one's own PPS, the present article extends the body-representation framework of Möllmann et al., (2024) into a process model of IPD regulation. The model specifies how self-body and other-body representations are coupled across action-guiding, metric, and evaluative stages within a continuous control loop, and proposes how this coupling could render otherwise contradictory findings (most notably the inconsistent IPD effects in anorexia nervosa) more tractable. I further argue that markerless multi-person motion capture is a suitable platform for measuring this process, and outline a research agenda that moves beyond static stop distances toward the approach-avoidance kinematics through which body-representation-based IPD dysregulation is most directly expressed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2026.106941
Primary Topic
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The two-body problem in interpersonal distance:A process model of social space regulation in psychopathology

Arvid Herwig
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
article

The two-body problem in interpersonal distance:A process model of social space regulation in psychopathology

Arvid Herwig
article en

Abstract

Interpersonal distance (IPD), the physical proximity individuals maintain during face-to-face interaction, is disrupted across a range of disorders involving distorted or threat-biased body representation, from eating disorders to social anxiety and schizophrenia. The dominant mechanistic account links this disruption to peripersonal space (PPS), modeling IPD as the output of the perceiver's own defensive boundary. This account is egocentric: it treats the approaching person as a source of threat rather than as a body whose size, kinematics, and spatial requirements must themselves be represented. IPD regulation, however, is a two-body problem that no current single-body model addresses. Drawing on recent evidence that the spatial properties of another person's body enter the same sensorimotor system that codes one's own PPS, the present article extends the body-representation framework of Möllmann et al., (2024) into a process model of IPD regulation. The model specifies how self-body and other-body representations are coupled across action-guiding, metric, and evaluative stages within a continuous control loop, and proposes how this coupling could render otherwise contradictory findings (most notably the inconsistent IPD effects in anorexia nervosa) more tractable. I further argue that markerless multi-person motion capture is a suitable platform for measuring this process, and outline a research agenda that moves beyond static stop distances toward the approach-avoidance kinematics through which body-representation-based IPD dysregulation is most directly expressed.

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Bielefeld University (DE), Hochschule Bielefeld (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.