Modern generative large language models in epilepsy care: a scoping review of current applications, challenges, and future directions

Modern generative large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being evaluated in epilepsy-related clinical tasks, but the evidence remains fragmented and their safe clinical role is uncertain. We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR framework, searching PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science Core Collection from inception to May 2026, to map current applications of modern generative LLMs in epilepsy-related clinical contexts and identify their reported benefits, limitations, and research gaps. Eligible studies evaluated generative LLMs or generative foundation models as the primary analytical or assistive engine in clinical or clinically oriented epilepsy tasks; non-generative natural language processing, conventional machine-learning, and signal-modeling studies served as contextual comparators only. Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted data for descriptive mapping and narrative synthesis. Twenty-four studies were included. Evidence was relatively more developed for text-centered tasks, including information extraction from electronic health records, question answering, and documentation support, while applications in differential diagnosis, presurgical evaluation, prognostic assessment, and patient communication remained early-stage. Across studies, the evidence base was heterogeneous, with frequent reliance on retrospective or simulated designs, single-center data, and limited external validation, alongside persistent concerns about hallucination, bias, model opacity, and workflow integration. Current evidence suggests a limited role for cautious, clinician-supervised use of generative LLMs in selected text-heavy epilepsy tasks, particularly extraction, summarization, documentation support, and patient education, but falls short of justifying independent or routine clinical deployment. Future studies should use narrower task definitions, epilepsy-specific datasets, transparent reporting of model versions and prompt design, external validation, and explicit documentation of clinician verification workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Epileptologica
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42494-026-00271-5
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modern generative large language models in epilepsy care: a scoping review of current applications, challenges, and future directions

Yueqian Sun, Shihao Ge, Qun Wang
Acta Epileptologica
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Modern generative large language models in epilepsy care: a scoping review of current applications, challenges, and future directions

Yueqian Sun, Shihao Ge, Qun Wang
article en

Abstract

Modern generative large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being evaluated in epilepsy-related clinical tasks, but the evidence remains fragmented and their safe clinical role is uncertain. We conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR framework, searching PubMed, Embase, and the Web of Science Core Collection from inception to May 2026, to map current applications of modern generative LLMs in epilepsy-related clinical contexts and identify their reported benefits, limitations, and research gaps. Eligible studies evaluated generative LLMs or generative foundation models as the primary analytical or assistive engine in clinical or clinically oriented epilepsy tasks; non-generative natural language processing, conventional machine-learning, and signal-modeling studies served as contextual comparators only. Two reviewers independently screened records and extracted data for descriptive mapping and narrative synthesis. Twenty-four studies were included. Evidence was relatively more developed for text-centered tasks, including information extraction from electronic health records, question answering, and documentation support, while applications in differential diagnosis, presurgical evaluation, prognostic assessment, and patient communication remained early-stage. Across studies, the evidence base was heterogeneous, with frequent reliance on retrospective or simulated designs, single-center data, and limited external validation, alongside persistent concerns about hallucination, bias, model opacity, and workflow integration. Current evidence suggests a limited role for cautious, clinician-supervised use of generative LLMs in selected text-heavy epilepsy tasks, particularly extraction, summarization, documentation support, and patient education, but falls short of justifying independent or routine clinical deployment. Future studies should use narrower task definitions, epilepsy-specific datasets, transparent reporting of model versions and prompt design, external validation, and explicit documentation of clinician verification workflows.

Acta EpileptologicaVol. 8(1)
Beijing Tian Tan Hospital (CN), National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (CN), Beijing Fengtai Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Beijing Postdoctoral Science Foundation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.