When do online reviews matter most for product innovation? Exploring institutional and organizational contextual factors in B2B firms

Purpose This research aims to address the critical need to understand how external feedback mechanisms (online reviews) drive innovation in the context of varying external institutional environments and firm-level capabilities. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on organizational learning theory, institutional theory and the dynamic capabilities framework, the study analyzes a sample of 558 B2B firms in China. Findings The findings reveal that online reviews positively influence product innovation, serving as a critical source of external knowledge. However, institutional development weakens this relationship, as firms in highly developed regions rely less on online feedback due to access to formalized market systems. Product diversification also weakens the relationship, reflecting challenges in integrating feedback across multiple product lines. Conversely, corporate compliance capability strengthens the relationship, enhancing firms’ absorptive capacity and alignment with regulatory and industry standards. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by exploring the boundary conditions under which online reviews drive product innovation and provides insights for managers to consider strategies based on institutional and organizational contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jbim-07-2025-0719
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When do online reviews matter most for product innovation? Exploring institutional and organizational contextual factors in B2B firms

Yian Chen
Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

When do online reviews matter most for product innovation? Exploring institutional and organizational contextual factors in B2B firms

Yian Chen
article en

Abstract

Purpose This research aims to address the critical need to understand how external feedback mechanisms (online reviews) drive innovation in the context of varying external institutional environments and firm-level capabilities. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on organizational learning theory, institutional theory and the dynamic capabilities framework, the study analyzes a sample of 558 B2B firms in China. Findings The findings reveal that online reviews positively influence product innovation, serving as a critical source of external knowledge. However, institutional development weakens this relationship, as firms in highly developed regions rely less on online feedback due to access to formalized market systems. Product diversification also weakens the relationship, reflecting challenges in integrating feedback across multiple product lines. Conversely, corporate compliance capability strengthens the relationship, enhancing firms’ absorptive capacity and alignment with regulatory and industry standards. Originality/value This study contributes to the literature by exploring the boundary conditions under which online reviews drive product innovation and provides insights for managers to consider strategies based on institutional and organizational contexts.

Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing
National Chiayi University (TW)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.