Attention Integration Strategies in MLP-Based Stock Movement Prediction: Effects on Performance, Stability, and Interpretability

Stock movement prediction remains challenging because financial data are non-stationary and noisy. While attention mechanisms are widely used to enhance neural networks, how different attention integration strategies affect performance and training stability has not been systematically examined. We present a multi-seed empirical analysis of MLP-based models under three integration strategies—plain MLP, naively inserted self-attention, and residual attention—together with LSTM and Transformer baselines, evaluating 16 configurations on 10 CSI 300 and 10 S&P 500 stocks under a strictly forward-looking label, a purged chronological split, and early stopping: 1600 runs in total. Interleaved naive attention, in which self-attention output replaces the forward-path representation, collapses to degenerate single-class predictions in every run on both markets, whereas strategies that preserve the original representation collapse no more often than attention-free models; this difference is decisive after correction for multiple comparisons (Holm-adjusted p < 10−3). In contrast, no significant accuracy differences are detected among families, including the baselines, once collapsed runs are excluded, and unconditional balanced accuracy is within 0.01 across all non-degenerate families—consistent with the limited short-horizon predictability implied by market efficiency theory. A Jacobian analysis of the attention block, verified by training diagnostics, attributes the collapse to a rank-one attention matrix that compresses the forward representation to a single scalar unless the original representation is retained. A multi-seed analysis further shows that attention weight interpretations are not reproducible across random seeds and should be validated across repeated runs. These findings show that integration strategy and representation preservation—not the mere inclusion of attention—determine whether attention-augmented lightweight models train reliably.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15173942
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Attention Integration Strategies in MLP-Based Stock Movement Prediction: Effects on Performance, Stability, and Interpretability

Woojin Cho, Yoojeong Song, Sang Ik Han, Juhan Yoo
Electronics
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
article

Attention Integration Strategies in MLP-Based Stock Movement Prediction: Effects on Performance, Stability, and Interpretability

Woojin Cho, Yoojeong Song, Sang Ik Han, Juhan Yoo
article en

Abstract

Stock movement prediction remains challenging because financial data are non-stationary and noisy. While attention mechanisms are widely used to enhance neural networks, how different attention integration strategies affect performance and training stability has not been systematically examined. We present a multi-seed empirical analysis of MLP-based models under three integration strategies—plain MLP, naively inserted self-attention, and residual attention—together with LSTM and Transformer baselines, evaluating 16 configurations on 10 CSI 300 and 10 S&P 500 stocks under a strictly forward-looking label, a purged chronological split, and early stopping: 1600 runs in total. Interleaved naive attention, in which self-attention output replaces the forward-path representation, collapses to degenerate single-class predictions in every run on both markets, whereas strategies that preserve the original representation collapse no more often than attention-free models; this difference is decisive after correction for multiple comparisons (Holm-adjusted p < 10−3). In contrast, no significant accuracy differences are detected among families, including the baselines, once collapsed runs are excluded, and unconditional balanced accuracy is within 0.01 across all non-degenerate families—consistent with the limited short-horizon predictability implied by market efficiency theory. A Jacobian analysis of the attention block, verified by training diagnostics, attributes the collapse to a rank-one attention matrix that compresses the forward representation to a single scalar unless the original representation is retained. A multi-seed analysis further shows that attention weight interpretations are not reproducible across random seeds and should be validated across repeated runs. These findings show that integration strategy and representation preservation—not the mere inclusion of attention—determine whether attention-augmented lightweight models train reliably.

ElectronicsVol. 15(17)
Soonchunhyang University (KR), Korea University of Technology and Education (KR), Dong-A University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.