Collaborating for inclusive practice: From support to partnership

This short paper explores how collaboration can enable inclusive and effective learning opportunities. Academic staff, learning developers, and librarians share responsibility for student success. However, they frequently work in parallel rather than in partnership, and opportunities to embed inclusive practice meaningfully within the curriculum are missed. I draw on my experience leading the Special Study Module programme within the MBChB, a curriculum co-created by academic, learning development, library, and learning technologist staff. This moves beyond a model of ‘learning’ + ‘learning support’ towards a collaborative and inclusive approach to curriculum design. Research highlights the limitations of ‘bolting on’ study skills to teaching and learning. Librarians and learning developers may be viewed as supplementary, and perhaps even only for ‘struggling’ students. However, there is value in embedding support within the curriculum and collaborating for curriculum design and delivery, rather than siloing librarians, learning developers, and learning technologists off as ‘external’ service providers. Collaborating to co-create curriculums that include skills development and academic support is consistent with inclusive curriculum design, leads to more effective practice, and enhances the student experience. I present examples from our co-created practice within the Special Study Modules (SSM) Programme, including: collaboratively designed formative assessments; contextualised skills development and training; and some of the principles that have underpinned our shared approach to student learning. Student feedback and engagement reflect the value of contextualised, embedded support. There are additional benefits for the collaborators including skills sharing, peer-support, and increased confidence and creativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Lancaster University Education Conference
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71957/r846vn82
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Literacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborating for inclusive practice: From support to partnership

Faye Tucker
Proceedings of the Lancaster University Education Conference
Library Science and Information Literacy
article

Collaborating for inclusive practice: From support to partnership

Faye Tucker
article en

Abstract

This short paper explores how collaboration can enable inclusive and effective learning opportunities. Academic staff, learning developers, and librarians share responsibility for student success. However, they frequently work in parallel rather than in partnership, and opportunities to embed inclusive practice meaningfully within the curriculum are missed. I draw on my experience leading the Special Study Module programme within the MBChB, a curriculum co-created by academic, learning development, library, and learning technologist staff. This moves beyond a model of ‘learning’ + ‘learning support’ towards a collaborative and inclusive approach to curriculum design. Research highlights the limitations of ‘bolting on’ study skills to teaching and learning. Librarians and learning developers may be viewed as supplementary, and perhaps even only for ‘struggling’ students. However, there is value in embedding support within the curriculum and collaborating for curriculum design and delivery, rather than siloing librarians, learning developers, and learning technologists off as ‘external’ service providers. Collaborating to co-create curriculums that include skills development and academic support is consistent with inclusive curriculum design, leads to more effective practice, and enhances the student experience. I present examples from our co-created practice within the Special Study Modules (SSM) Programme, including: collaboratively designed formative assessments; contextualised skills development and training; and some of the principles that have underpinned our shared approach to student learning. Student feedback and engagement reflect the value of contextualised, embedded support. There are additional benefits for the collaborators including skills sharing, peer-support, and increased confidence and creativity.

Proceedings of the Lancaster University Education Conference
Lancaster University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Library Science and Information Literacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.