Factors Associated with Intention to Be Vaccinated Against Seasonal Influenza in Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Health Belief Model Constructs in Serbia

Introduction: As seasonal influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Serbia remains suboptimal, we aimed to identify HCW beliefs associated with their intention to receive seasonal influenza vaccine (“vaccination intention”) in the season 2024/2025. Methods: In a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2024, healthcare institutions were selected from a national registry, using multi-stage sampling stratified by geographical region and healthcare level. All consenting HCWs present on the survey day self-completed questionnaires. Five dichotomised Health Belief Model constructs were assessed: perceived susceptibility to influenza, perceived disease severity, perceived vaccination benefits, perceived physical and psychological barriers, and perceived cues for action (recommendation by another HCW, someone close, or a supervisor). The association of vaccination intention (yes/no/undecided) with Health Belief Model constructs, demographic and occupational factors were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Results: Of 1919 respondents, 30% declared positive vaccination intention, 52.5% no intention, and 17.5% were undecided. Compared with no intention, positive vaccination intention was associated with perceived self-benefit (aOR = 6.22, CI = 3.49–11.08), perceived patient benefit (aOR = 2.26, CI = 1.48–3.45), perceived susceptibility (aOR = 3.26, CI = 2.19–4.86), and perceived vaccine safety (aOR = 2.95, CI = 1.93–4.50). Participants were more likely to be undecided than reject vaccination if they experienced higher perceived susceptibility (aOR = 2.93, CI = 1.89–4.54), perceived influenza as severe (aOR = 2.04, CI = 1.30–3.21), perceived patient benefits (aOR = 1.77, CI = 1.14–2.74), or recalled receiving a recommendation from another HCW (aOR = 2.63, CI = 1.17–5.85). Conclusions: HCWs’ positive vaccination intention was associated with beliefs relevant for personal health and patient benefits. The undecided group showed a distinct pattern of beliefs warranting their separate analysis and specific approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccines
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14090763
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors Associated with Intention to Be Vaccinated Against Seasonal Influenza in Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Health Belief Model Constructs in Serbia

Zoran Bukumirić, Verica Jovanovic, Biljana Kilibarda, Sofija Jovanović et al.
Vaccines
Influenza Virus Research Studies
article

Factors Associated with Intention to Be Vaccinated Against Seasonal Influenza in Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Health Belief Model Constructs in Serbia

Zoran Bukumirić, Verica Jovanovic, Biljana Kilibarda, Sofija Jovanović, M Milinković, Dragana Dimitrijević, Larisa Vujnović
article en

Abstract

Introduction: As seasonal influenza vaccination coverage among healthcare workers (HCWs) in Serbia remains suboptimal, we aimed to identify HCW beliefs associated with their intention to receive seasonal influenza vaccine (“vaccination intention”) in the season 2024/2025. Methods: In a cross-sectional survey conducted in 2024, healthcare institutions were selected from a national registry, using multi-stage sampling stratified by geographical region and healthcare level. All consenting HCWs present on the survey day self-completed questionnaires. Five dichotomised Health Belief Model constructs were assessed: perceived susceptibility to influenza, perceived disease severity, perceived vaccination benefits, perceived physical and psychological barriers, and perceived cues for action (recommendation by another HCW, someone close, or a supervisor). The association of vaccination intention (yes/no/undecided) with Health Belief Model constructs, demographic and occupational factors were assessed using multinomial logistic regression. Results: Of 1919 respondents, 30% declared positive vaccination intention, 52.5% no intention, and 17.5% were undecided. Compared with no intention, positive vaccination intention was associated with perceived self-benefit (aOR = 6.22, CI = 3.49–11.08), perceived patient benefit (aOR = 2.26, CI = 1.48–3.45), perceived susceptibility (aOR = 3.26, CI = 2.19–4.86), and perceived vaccine safety (aOR = 2.95, CI = 1.93–4.50). Participants were more likely to be undecided than reject vaccination if they experienced higher perceived susceptibility (aOR = 2.93, CI = 1.89–4.54), perceived influenza as severe (aOR = 2.04, CI = 1.30–3.21), perceived patient benefits (aOR = 1.77, CI = 1.14–2.74), or recalled receiving a recommendation from another HCW (aOR = 2.63, CI = 1.17–5.85). Conclusions: HCWs’ positive vaccination intention was associated with beliefs relevant for personal health and patient benefits. The undecided group showed a distinct pattern of beliefs warranting their separate analysis and specific approaches.

VaccinesVol. 14(9)
University of Belgrade (RS), University Clinical Centre (PL), Institute of Public Health of Serbia (RS), European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (SE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.