Megafauna in Laos: historical losses, present status, and recovery prospects

Laos has historically supported a rich megafauna assemblage, much of which has been lost in modern times. We compiled and analyzed historical and contemporary evidence (ca. 1850–2026) to reconstruct trajectories, assess current status, and identify recovery prospects for Laos’s megafauna, focusing on rhinoceroses, tigers ( Panthera tigris ), and elephants ( Elephas maximus ). Javan ( Eurhinoceros sondaicus ) and Sumatran ( Dicerorhinus sumatrensis ) rhinoceroses occurred historically in Laos, with credible records continuing until approximately 1990, although the later records do not allow species-level attribution or determination of when each species disappeared. Both are now extirpated from the country. Tigers remained widespread into the early 2000s, but declined rapidly, with the last verified images from 2013; they are now considered extirpated, although limited potential for recovery may remain through recolonization or reintroduction. Asian elephants persist, but only an estimated 300–400 individuals remain across approximately 24 putative population units, 88% of which reportedly contain fewer than 20 individuals. Their demographics, connectivity, and long-term viability remain uncertain, although Nakai–Nam Theun and Nam Pouy are the two largest populations and likely have better persistence prospects than others. Reducing mortality and maintaining or restoring connectivity could improve prospects for smaller populations. Hunting for food and the wildlife trade—facilitated by widespread firearms, weak deterrence, and expanding infrastructure—have contributed to widespread faunal depletion and “empty forests.” Accelerating development may increase access, trade, and demand for wildlife products, but could also create opportunities for coordinated transboundary protection and enforcement. Recovery remains possible for some of Laos’s megafauna, but opportunities are rapidly narrowing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Ecology and Conservation
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2026.e04399
Primary Topic
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Megafauna in Laos: historical losses, present status, and recovery prospects

Thananh Khotpathoom, Duangphachan Souvansai, Ahimsa Campos‐Arceiz, Try Surya Harapan et al.
Global Ecology and Conservation
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
article

Megafauna in Laos: historical losses, present status, and recovery prospects

Thananh Khotpathoom, Duangphachan Souvansai, Ahimsa Campos‐Arceiz, Try Surya Harapan, Khamkhoun Khounboline, William V. Bleisch, Bounthavy Manyvong, Nadine Ruppert
article en

Abstract

Laos has historically supported a rich megafauna assemblage, much of which has been lost in modern times. We compiled and analyzed historical and contemporary evidence (ca. 1850–2026) to reconstruct trajectories, assess current status, and identify recovery prospects for Laos’s megafauna, focusing on rhinoceroses, tigers ( Panthera tigris ), and elephants ( Elephas maximus ). Javan ( Eurhinoceros sondaicus ) and Sumatran ( Dicerorhinus sumatrensis ) rhinoceroses occurred historically in Laos, with credible records continuing until approximately 1990, although the later records do not allow species-level attribution or determination of when each species disappeared. Both are now extirpated from the country. Tigers remained widespread into the early 2000s, but declined rapidly, with the last verified images from 2013; they are now considered extirpated, although limited potential for recovery may remain through recolonization or reintroduction. Asian elephants persist, but only an estimated 300–400 individuals remain across approximately 24 putative population units, 88% of which reportedly contain fewer than 20 individuals. Their demographics, connectivity, and long-term viability remain uncertain, although Nakai–Nam Theun and Nam Pouy are the two largest populations and likely have better persistence prospects than others. Reducing mortality and maintaining or restoring connectivity could improve prospects for smaller populations. Hunting for food and the wildlife trade—facilitated by widespread firearms, weak deterrence, and expanding infrastructure—have contributed to widespread faunal depletion and “empty forests.” Accelerating development may increase access, trade, and demand for wildlife products, but could also create opportunities for coordinated transboundary protection and enforcement. Recovery remains possible for some of Laos’s megafauna, but opportunities are rapidly narrowing.

Global Ecology and Conservation
Fauna and Flora International (GB), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (LA), Save the Elephants (KE), Yunnan University (CN), Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), National University of Laos (LA)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, High-end Foreign Experts Recruitment Plan of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.