Are Ceramic Cages an Option for Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Comparative Biomechanical Numerical Study

Background: The treatment of severe disc pathologies through lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) involves the insertion of an interbody cage into the degenerated disc space, together with a supporting fixation system. Conventional cage materials, such as Ti6Al4V and PEEK, present several limitations, most notably their non-biodegradability, increasing the risk of cage migration and long-term subsidence (up to 40% incidence). Bioceramics may represent an option while addressing the issue of biodegradability. This study preliminarily investigates the applicability of a commercial bioceramic as an interbody cage material for LIF. Methods: First, an intact L4-L5 functional spine unit (FSU) was validated under both pure moments and combined loading conditions. Subsequently, all surgical steps of the LIF procedure were simulated, followed by postoperative physiological loading to compare the mechanical performance of the ceramic device with standard titanium cages. Two surgical techniques, posterior-LIF (PLIF) and eXtreme-LIF (XLIF), were analyzed. Each simulation assessed the mechanical strength of the interbody cage, the posterior fixation, and the vertebral bone, together with the FSU kinematic. Results: The intact model accurately predicted literature-reported kinematics and intradiscal pressure, and the LIF model reproduced forces on titanium cages consistent with in vitro measurements on human specimens. Both XLIF and PLIF procedures resulted in significant kinematic stabilization of the FSU, with > 70% reduction in range of motion. For PLIF, ceramic cages sustained applied loads with no predicted failure, while XLIF showed minimal interface failure (< 0.6%). Compared with titanium, ceramic cages significantly reduced adjacent vertebral strain, lowering the subsidence risk, without overloading the posterior fixation system. Conclusion: The present study supports the potential of bioceramics as viable materials for interbody cage applications in LIF procedures. Experimental tests and clinical validation should be accompanied to further cage design optimization to enhance the safety margins of this novel bioceramic device and ensure proper clinical effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOR Spine
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.70215
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Are Ceramic Cages an Option for Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Comparative Biomechanical Numerical Study

Luigi La Barbera, Davide Ninarello
JOR Spine
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Are Ceramic Cages an Option for Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Comparative Biomechanical Numerical Study

Luigi La Barbera, Davide Ninarello
article en

Abstract

Background: The treatment of severe disc pathologies through lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) involves the insertion of an interbody cage into the degenerated disc space, together with a supporting fixation system. Conventional cage materials, such as Ti6Al4V and PEEK, present several limitations, most notably their non-biodegradability, increasing the risk of cage migration and long-term subsidence (up to 40% incidence). Bioceramics may represent an option while addressing the issue of biodegradability. This study preliminarily investigates the applicability of a commercial bioceramic as an interbody cage material for LIF. Methods: First, an intact L4-L5 functional spine unit (FSU) was validated under both pure moments and combined loading conditions. Subsequently, all surgical steps of the LIF procedure were simulated, followed by postoperative physiological loading to compare the mechanical performance of the ceramic device with standard titanium cages. Two surgical techniques, posterior-LIF (PLIF) and eXtreme-LIF (XLIF), were analyzed. Each simulation assessed the mechanical strength of the interbody cage, the posterior fixation, and the vertebral bone, together with the FSU kinematic. Results: The intact model accurately predicted literature-reported kinematics and intradiscal pressure, and the LIF model reproduced forces on titanium cages consistent with in vitro measurements on human specimens. Both XLIF and PLIF procedures resulted in significant kinematic stabilization of the FSU, with > 70% reduction in range of motion. For PLIF, ceramic cages sustained applied loads with no predicted failure, while XLIF showed minimal interface failure (< 0.6%). Compared with titanium, ceramic cages significantly reduced adjacent vertebral strain, lowering the subsidence risk, without overloading the posterior fixation system. Conclusion: The present study supports the potential of bioceramics as viable materials for interbody cage applications in LIF procedures. Experimental tests and clinical validation should be accompanied to further cage design optimization to enhance the safety margins of this novel bioceramic device and ensure proper clinical effectiveness.

JOR SpineVol. 9(3)
Politecnico di Milano (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.