Symbiotic Mutualism? A Process Perspective on the HRM and L&D Professions

ABSTRACT Professional HR associations are pivotal, yet under‐researched, institutions that shape recognition, accreditation, legitimacy and professional boundary definition in the HR field. In this paper we argue that as HR work expands into domains such as talent management, HR analytics, coaching, and mentoring, professional boundaries are better understood as dynamic and contested than as fixed outcomes of ‘closure’. This paper focuses on boundary adjustment at the interface of two enduring fields of HR practice: Human Resource Management (HRM) and Learning and Development (L&D). We report a 100‐year historical process analysis of the UK Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), drawing on archival, oral and publicly available sources, to address the question: what are the processes by which different HR‐related occupational or professional boundaries are established, developed, and changed? Our findings show concurrent processes of contestation, cooperation and boundary readjustment between HRM and L&D. We propose the concept of symbiotic mutualism to describe the process whereby these adjacent professional groups navigate and adjust their boundary claims. The concept of symbiosis has important implications for HR and other corporate professions where new areas of specialized practice continue to emerge.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Resource Management Journal
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.70064
Primary Topic
AI and HR Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Symbiotic Mutualism? A Process Perspective on the HRM and L&D Professions

Paul Tosey, Valerie Anderson, Carole Elliott, Patricia Jolliffe
Human Resource Management Journal
AI and HR Technologies
article

Symbiotic Mutualism? A Process Perspective on the HRM and L&D Professions

Paul Tosey, Valerie Anderson, Carole Elliott, Patricia Jolliffe
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Professional HR associations are pivotal, yet under‐researched, institutions that shape recognition, accreditation, legitimacy and professional boundary definition in the HR field. In this paper we argue that as HR work expands into domains such as talent management, HR analytics, coaching, and mentoring, professional boundaries are better understood as dynamic and contested than as fixed outcomes of ‘closure’. This paper focuses on boundary adjustment at the interface of two enduring fields of HR practice: Human Resource Management (HRM) and Learning and Development (L&D). We report a 100‐year historical process analysis of the UK Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD), drawing on archival, oral and publicly available sources, to address the question: what are the processes by which different HR‐related occupational or professional boundaries are established, developed, and changed? Our findings show concurrent processes of contestation, cooperation and boundary readjustment between HRM and L&D. We propose the concept of symbiotic mutualism to describe the process whereby these adjacent professional groups navigate and adjust their boundary claims. The concept of symbiosis has important implications for HR and other corporate professions where new areas of specialized practice continue to emerge.

Human Resource Management Journal
University of St Andrews (GB), University of Portsmouth (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
AI and HR Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.