Addressing barriers to accurate discharge data quality through a co-designed educational intervention

Abstract Background The Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) system is Ireland’s national administrative database for activity in publicly funded acute hospitals. It informs healthcare planning, funding allocation, and patient safety monitoring. However, Hospital-Acquired Adverse Events (HAAEs) may be underrepresented within administrative datasets due to challenges in clinical documentation, uncertainty regarding HAAE identification, and limited communication between clinicians and Administrative Health Data (AHD) coders. This study aimed to develop and pilot a co-designed educational intervention to improve documentation and coding of selected HAAEs. Methods A four-stage co-creation framework was employed, consisting of (1) evidence review, (2) data collection and stakeholder consultation, (3) co-production, and (4) prototyping. Literature and policy reviews were conducted to identify existing challenges and education associated with administrative data recording, focused on improving documentation related to three underreported HAAEs: delirium, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections. Data were collected from non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs) through three focus groups and discussions with consultants, and from AHD coders and managers through a national survey and policymaker consultation. Findings informed collaborative development of an educational intervention. Prototype resources were piloted with new NCHDs, and perceived acceptability and value were assessed. Results In co-creating resources, twelve NCHDs took part in focus groups and seventy-five AHD coders and managers completed a mixed-methods survey. Both groups reported barriers to data production including limited understanding of each other’s roles in data production processes. Insights informed the development of targeted educational resources designed to tie-in with existing clinical processes. In a pilot evaluation, with a further ten newly qualified NCHDs, all participants reported low confidence in completing documentation to support HAAE coding prior to the intervention. Following the intervention, all reported increased confidence and high acceptability of resources. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of a co-designed educational intervention aimed at improving patient documentation and accurate recording of hospital-acquired adverse events. The participation of NCHDs and AHD coders supported the co-creation of resources addressing real-world documentation and coding challenges. While further evaluation across multiple sites is required, findings suggest that targeted, co-produced educational tools may contribute to improvements in administrative data quality, enhanced patient safety monitoring and healthcare planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15475-1
Primary Topic
Medical Coding and Health Information
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing barriers to accurate discharge data quality through a co-designed educational intervention

Anna Connolly, Rachel McCauley, Anne Matthews, Marcia Kirwan
BMC Health Services Research
Medical Coding and Health Information
article

Addressing barriers to accurate discharge data quality through a co-designed educational intervention

Anna Connolly, Rachel McCauley, Anne Matthews, Marcia Kirwan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Hospital In-Patient Enquiry (HIPE) system is Ireland’s national administrative database for activity in publicly funded acute hospitals. It informs healthcare planning, funding allocation, and patient safety monitoring. However, Hospital-Acquired Adverse Events (HAAEs) may be underrepresented within administrative datasets due to challenges in clinical documentation, uncertainty regarding HAAE identification, and limited communication between clinicians and Administrative Health Data (AHD) coders. This study aimed to develop and pilot a co-designed educational intervention to improve documentation and coding of selected HAAEs. Methods A four-stage co-creation framework was employed, consisting of (1) evidence review, (2) data collection and stakeholder consultation, (3) co-production, and (4) prototyping. Literature and policy reviews were conducted to identify existing challenges and education associated with administrative data recording, focused on improving documentation related to three underreported HAAEs: delirium, pneumonia, and urinary tract infections. Data were collected from non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs) through three focus groups and discussions with consultants, and from AHD coders and managers through a national survey and policymaker consultation. Findings informed collaborative development of an educational intervention. Prototype resources were piloted with new NCHDs, and perceived acceptability and value were assessed. Results In co-creating resources, twelve NCHDs took part in focus groups and seventy-five AHD coders and managers completed a mixed-methods survey. Both groups reported barriers to data production including limited understanding of each other’s roles in data production processes. Insights informed the development of targeted educational resources designed to tie-in with existing clinical processes. In a pilot evaluation, with a further ten newly qualified NCHDs, all participants reported low confidence in completing documentation to support HAAE coding prior to the intervention. Following the intervention, all reported increased confidence and high acceptability of resources. Conclusions This study demonstrates the feasibility and acceptability of a co-designed educational intervention aimed at improving patient documentation and accurate recording of hospital-acquired adverse events. The participation of NCHDs and AHD coders supported the co-creation of resources addressing real-world documentation and coding challenges. While further evaluation across multiple sites is required, findings suggest that targeted, co-produced educational tools may contribute to improvements in administrative data quality, enhanced patient safety monitoring and healthcare planning.

BMC Health Services Research
Dublin City University (IE)
Health Research Board
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Medical Coding and Health Information
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.