Multi-model assessment of yield stability in lentil across multi-environments

Developing high-yielding and stable lentil genotypes is essential for sustaining productivity under increasingly variable climatic conditions. However, strong genotype × environment (G × E) interactions often complicate the identification of widely adapted genotypes. Although several stability models are available, each has distinct strengths and limitations, making it uncertain whether a single model or a combination of models provides the most reliable selection. Therefore, this study compared multiple stability models to identify high-yielding and stable lentil genotypes and to evaluate their effectiveness for genotype selection. A set of lentil genotypes was evaluated across four diverse environments using a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Adjusted mean data were analyzed using the Eberhart and Russell regression model, AMMI (Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction), BLUP (Best Linear Unbiased Prediction), and WAASBY (Weighted Average of Absolute Scores and Yield). Significant G × E interactions confirmed differential genotype responses across environments. The Eberhart and Russell model identified stable genotypes based on regression coefficients close to unity and minimal deviation from regression. AMMI and BLUP effectively partitioned G × E effects and distinguished genotypes with broad and specific adaptation. WAASBY integrated yield and stability into a single index and was particularly effective in identifying genotypes with superior performance and wide adaptability. Correlation analysis among stability indices and the Genotype Selection Index (GSI) further strengthened the comparison and integration of model outputs. Genotypes G4, G8, G9, and G3 consistently exhibited high yield and stable performance across environments, with G4 emerging as the most promising and widely adapted genotype. This study demonstrates that integrating regression, mixed model, and multivariate based stability analyses provides a more robust framework for selecting stable, high-yielding lentil genotypes than relying on a single method, thereby supporting breeding for diverse agro-ecological conditions in Pakistan.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0356741
Primary Topic
Genetics and Plant Breeding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Multi-model assessment of yield stability in lentil across multi-environments

Khalid Pervaiz Akhtar, Muhammad Shahbaz, Maria Ghaffar, Aqsa Tabasum et al.
PLoS ONE
Genetics and Plant Breeding
article

Multi-model assessment of yield stability in lentil across multi-environments

Khalid Pervaiz Akhtar, Muhammad Shahbaz, Maria Ghaffar, Aqsa Tabasum, Muhammad Jawad Asghar, Ghulam Rabbani, Muhammad Kamran, Amjad Hameed, Uzma Javed, Muhammad Shahid, Muhammad Ehtisham-ul-Haq
article en

Abstract

Developing high-yielding and stable lentil genotypes is essential for sustaining productivity under increasingly variable climatic conditions. However, strong genotype × environment (G × E) interactions often complicate the identification of widely adapted genotypes. Although several stability models are available, each has distinct strengths and limitations, making it uncertain whether a single model or a combination of models provides the most reliable selection. Therefore, this study compared multiple stability models to identify high-yielding and stable lentil genotypes and to evaluate their effectiveness for genotype selection. A set of lentil genotypes was evaluated across four diverse environments using a randomized complete block design (RCBD). Adjusted mean data were analyzed using the Eberhart and Russell regression model, AMMI (Additive Main Effects and Multiplicative Interaction), BLUP (Best Linear Unbiased Prediction), and WAASBY (Weighted Average of Absolute Scores and Yield). Significant G × E interactions confirmed differential genotype responses across environments. The Eberhart and Russell model identified stable genotypes based on regression coefficients close to unity and minimal deviation from regression. AMMI and BLUP effectively partitioned G × E effects and distinguished genotypes with broad and specific adaptation. WAASBY integrated yield and stability into a single index and was particularly effective in identifying genotypes with superior performance and wide adaptability. Correlation analysis among stability indices and the Genotype Selection Index (GSI) further strengthened the comparison and integration of model outputs. Genotypes G4, G8, G9, and G3 consistently exhibited high yield and stable performance across environments, with G4 emerging as the most promising and widely adapted genotype. This study demonstrates that integrating regression, mixed model, and multivariate based stability analyses provides a more robust framework for selecting stable, high-yielding lentil genotypes than relying on a single method, thereby supporting breeding for diverse agro-ecological conditions in Pakistan.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(9)
Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology (PK), Radiation Oncology Institute (US), Ayub Agriculture Research Institute (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Genetics and Plant Breeding
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.