An intelligent Pythagorean fuzzy MSD–CRITIC–RAWEC framework for assessing psychological states in political education classrooms

Psychological state assessment in political education classrooms involves uncertain, vague, and hesitant assessment information associated with students’ emotional, behavioral, and cognitive conditions. Traditional evaluation approaches are often insufficient for effectively handling such uncertainty in intelligent educational environments. To address this limitation, this study proposes an intelligent Pythagorean fuzzy Mean Square Deviation–Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation–Ranking of Alternatives by Weighted Evaluation under Criteria (PF-MSD–CRITIC–RAWEC) framework for assessing psychological states in political education classrooms. The proposed framework integrates Pythagorean fuzzy theory with the MSD, CRITIC, and RAWEC methods to manage uncertain psychological assessment information, objectively determine criteria importance, and generate reliable ranking results for classroom psychological monitoring alternatives. A case study involving thirty alternatives and ten psychological assessment criteria was conducted to demonstrate the applicability and computational effectiveness of the proposed framework. Comparative and sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the reliability, robustness, and ranking stability of the proposed approach under uncertain decision-making conditions. The obtained results indicate that the proposed framework provides an effective intelligent decision-support model for psychological assessment and adaptive educational management under uncertain classroom environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-64245-w
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An intelligent Pythagorean fuzzy MSD–CRITIC–RAWEC framework for assessing psychological states in political education classrooms

Jinying Li
Scientific Reports
Cognitive Science and Mapping
article

An intelligent Pythagorean fuzzy MSD–CRITIC–RAWEC framework for assessing psychological states in political education classrooms

Jinying Li
article en

Abstract

Psychological state assessment in political education classrooms involves uncertain, vague, and hesitant assessment information associated with students’ emotional, behavioral, and cognitive conditions. Traditional evaluation approaches are often insufficient for effectively handling such uncertainty in intelligent educational environments. To address this limitation, this study proposes an intelligent Pythagorean fuzzy Mean Square Deviation–Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation–Ranking of Alternatives by Weighted Evaluation under Criteria (PF-MSD–CRITIC–RAWEC) framework for assessing psychological states in political education classrooms. The proposed framework integrates Pythagorean fuzzy theory with the MSD, CRITIC, and RAWEC methods to manage uncertain psychological assessment information, objectively determine criteria importance, and generate reliable ranking results for classroom psychological monitoring alternatives. A case study involving thirty alternatives and ten psychological assessment criteria was conducted to demonstrate the applicability and computational effectiveness of the proposed framework. Comparative and sensitivity analyses were performed to verify the reliability, robustness, and ranking stability of the proposed approach under uncertain decision-making conditions. The obtained results indicate that the proposed framework provides an effective intelligent decision-support model for psychological assessment and adaptive educational management under uncertain classroom environments.

Scientific Reports
Hunan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.