Critical reflection as democratic practice: agency, participation and leadership in early childhood education in the digital age

Critical reflection occupies a central position within early childhood education and care (ECEC) quality frameworks. However, within increasingly regulated and digitally mediated environments, critical reflection exists within tensions between professional autonomy, democratic practice, and accountability requirements. This paper examines how critical reflection is enacted within one Australian faith-based early childhood education and care setting and explores the organisational conditions influencing educators' reflective practice. Drawing on a qualitative interpretivist case study informed by grounded theory methods, the study investigates educators' experiences through interviews, observations, reflective processes, and document analysis to examine reflective practice as it occurred within everyday organisational contexts. Findings indicate that critical reflection was enacted as a relational, distributed practice informed through professional dialogue, leadership participation, mentoring relationships and organisational structures with the SCHEMED framework emerging inductively. The paper contributes to ECEC scholarship by positioning critical reflection as a democratic professional practice shaped by relational, organisational and socio-digital conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Early Childhood Education Research Journal
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293x.2026.2722184
Primary Topic
Early Childhood Education and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Critical reflection as democratic practice: agency, participation and leadership in early childhood education in the digital age

Debra Williams
European Early Childhood Education Research Journal
Early Childhood Education and Development
article

Critical reflection as democratic practice: agency, participation and leadership in early childhood education in the digital age

Debra Williams
article en

Abstract

Critical reflection occupies a central position within early childhood education and care (ECEC) quality frameworks. However, within increasingly regulated and digitally mediated environments, critical reflection exists within tensions between professional autonomy, democratic practice, and accountability requirements. This paper examines how critical reflection is enacted within one Australian faith-based early childhood education and care setting and explores the organisational conditions influencing educators' reflective practice. Drawing on a qualitative interpretivist case study informed by grounded theory methods, the study investigates educators' experiences through interviews, observations, reflective processes, and document analysis to examine reflective practice as it occurred within everyday organisational contexts. Findings indicate that critical reflection was enacted as a relational, distributed practice informed through professional dialogue, leadership participation, mentoring relationships and organisational structures with the SCHEMED framework emerging inductively. The paper contributes to ECEC scholarship by positioning critical reflection as a democratic professional practice shaped by relational, organisational and socio-digital conditions.

European Early Childhood Education Research Journal
Alphacrucis University College (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Early Childhood Education and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.