Effects of a Protein-Binding Additive and Brown Sorghum Bran Extract on In Vitro Rumen Fermentation, Intestinal Digestibility and Amino Acid Profiles of Protein Meals

Excessive protein degradation reduces protein-use efficiency in ruminants. This in vitro study evaluated brown-sorghum-bran extract (SBE; 20 or 40 g/kg DM), BioProtect (15 or 30 mL/kg DM), and tannic acid (30 g/kg DM; positive control) in soybean and canola meals. Gas production and ammonia-N were assessed over 24 h; protein digestion and amino acid concentrations were also determined. Gas production and ammonia-N were generally lower in treated meals, with responses dependent on substrate, additive and incubation time (p ≤ 0.003). Substrate × additive interactions affected RDP, RUP and IVIDP (p < 0.001). The higher inclusion rates, 40 g/kg DM SBE and 30 mL/kg DM BioProtect, did not differ from tannic acid in RDP, RUP or IVIDP within either substrate. After in vitro intestinal digestion, total EAA showed a substrate × additive interaction (p = 0.033); 30 mL/kg DM BioProtect and 40 g/kg DM SBE produced among the highest total EAA concentrations in both substrates. Among the individual acid-hydrolysable EAA recovered from the liquid fraction after in vitro intestinal digestion, only methionine concentration was affected by additive treatment (p < 0.001). Overall, 30 mL/kg DM BioProtect and 40 g/kg DM SBE produced the most consistent responses for RDP, RUP and IVIDP; however, total digested CP decreased slightly (p < 0.001), and amino-acid responses were variable. In vivo studies are required to determine effects on amino-acid supply and animal responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fermentation
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/fermentation12090413
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effects of a Protein-Binding Additive and Brown Sorghum Bran Extract on In Vitro Rumen Fermentation, Intestinal Digestibility and Amino Acid Profiles of Protein Meals

Kristy DiGiacomo, B. J. Leury, Frank R. Dunshea, Bereket Zeleke Tunkala et al.
Fermentation
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Effects of a Protein-Binding Additive and Brown Sorghum Bran Extract on In Vitro Rumen Fermentation, Intestinal Digestibility and Amino Acid Profiles of Protein Meals

Kristy DiGiacomo, B. J. Leury, Frank R. Dunshea, Bereket Zeleke Tunkala, P.S. Alvarez-Hess, Jeremy J. Cottrell
article en

Abstract

Excessive protein degradation reduces protein-use efficiency in ruminants. This in vitro study evaluated brown-sorghum-bran extract (SBE; 20 or 40 g/kg DM), BioProtect (15 or 30 mL/kg DM), and tannic acid (30 g/kg DM; positive control) in soybean and canola meals. Gas production and ammonia-N were assessed over 24 h; protein digestion and amino acid concentrations were also determined. Gas production and ammonia-N were generally lower in treated meals, with responses dependent on substrate, additive and incubation time (p ≤ 0.003). Substrate × additive interactions affected RDP, RUP and IVIDP (p < 0.001). The higher inclusion rates, 40 g/kg DM SBE and 30 mL/kg DM BioProtect, did not differ from tannic acid in RDP, RUP or IVIDP within either substrate. After in vitro intestinal digestion, total EAA showed a substrate × additive interaction (p = 0.033); 30 mL/kg DM BioProtect and 40 g/kg DM SBE produced among the highest total EAA concentrations in both substrates. Among the individual acid-hydrolysable EAA recovered from the liquid fraction after in vitro intestinal digestion, only methionine concentration was affected by additive treatment (p < 0.001). Overall, 30 mL/kg DM BioProtect and 40 g/kg DM SBE produced the most consistent responses for RDP, RUP and IVIDP; however, total digested CP decreased slightly (p < 0.001), and amino-acid responses were variable. In vivo studies are required to determine effects on amino-acid supply and animal responses.

FermentationVol. 12(9)
University of Leeds (GB), The University of Melbourne (AU), Agriculture Victoria (AU), Ellinbank Observatory (AU)
University of Melbourne
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.