Marketplace Coverage During Pregnancy: What Can We Learn from State-level Variation?

Abstract Introduction Little is known about the role of the Affordable Care Act Marketplaces in providing health insurance coverage for pregnant women. Methods Using PRAMS survey data from 2018-2019 from 36 states and Washington DC, we estimate the percentage of women with a pregnancy resulting in live birth who had Marketplace coverage during pregnancy, overall, by state, by Federal Poverty Level (FPL) categories, and by state-based versus federal Marketplace status. We also describe the preconception and postpartum insurance status and sociodemographic and health characteristics of pregnant Marketplace enrollees. Results 4.9% pregnant women had Marketplace coverage in 2018-2019. This percentage varied by state (1.6% in Iowa to 13.1% in Maryland) and was significantly higher in state-based Marketplaces vs. federally-run/facilitated Marketplaces (8.0% vs. 3.5%) and among premium subsidy-eligible women (i.e., <400% FPL). Pregnant Marketplace enrollees were more similar to pregnant women with Medicaid than those with private insurance in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and clinical predictors of adverse pregnancies outcomes. Conclusion Marketplace coverage is a small but important coverage source for women who had a live birth, insuring 1 in 20 women in our sample. The extent to which pandemic-era and recent policies affected Marketplace coverage of this population merits further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs Scholar
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag233
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Marketplace Coverage During Pregnancy: What Can We Learn from State-level Variation?

Alison Amidei Galbraith, Julia C. P. Eddelbuettel, Anjali J. Kaimal, Laura Faden Garabedian et al.
Health Affairs Scholar
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Marketplace Coverage During Pregnancy: What Can We Learn from State-level Variation?

Alison Amidei Galbraith, Julia C. P. Eddelbuettel, Anjali J. Kaimal, Laura Faden Garabedian, Sarah H. Gordon
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Little is known about the role of the Affordable Care Act Marketplaces in providing health insurance coverage for pregnant women. Methods Using PRAMS survey data from 2018-2019 from 36 states and Washington DC, we estimate the percentage of women with a pregnancy resulting in live birth who had Marketplace coverage during pregnancy, overall, by state, by Federal Poverty Level (FPL) categories, and by state-based versus federal Marketplace status. We also describe the preconception and postpartum insurance status and sociodemographic and health characteristics of pregnant Marketplace enrollees. Results 4.9% pregnant women had Marketplace coverage in 2018-2019. This percentage varied by state (1.6% in Iowa to 13.1% in Maryland) and was significantly higher in state-based Marketplaces vs. federally-run/facilitated Marketplaces (8.0% vs. 3.5%) and among premium subsidy-eligible women (i.e., <400% FPL). Pregnant Marketplace enrollees were more similar to pregnant women with Medicaid than those with private insurance in terms of sociodemographic characteristics and clinical predictors of adverse pregnancies outcomes. Conclusion Marketplace coverage is a small but important coverage source for women who had a live birth, insuring 1 in 20 women in our sample. The extent to which pandemic-era and recent policies affected Marketplace coverage of this population merits further investigation.

Health Affairs Scholar
Boston University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Harvard University (US), University of South Florida (US), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US)
National Science Foundation, State of Connecticut Department of Public Health, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.