Copra meal in animal nutrition: nutritional constraints, processing strategies, and species-specific utilization

Copra meal (CM), a co-product of coconut oil extraction, is a regionally important feed ingredient whose value cannot be judged from crude protein concentration alone.Its nutritional value is affected by drying and oil-extraction conditions, residual lipid content, mannan-rich cell-wall carbohydrates, and the digestive capacity of the target species.This review evaluates CM in poultry, swine, and ruminant diets, with emphasis on nutritional constraints, processing strategies, and species-specific utilization.Copra meal generally provides moderate crude protein, a low lysine-to-crude protein ratio, variable residual oil, and a carbohydrate fraction dominated by β-mannans, including galactomannans.In monogastric animals, these characteristics may restrict nutrient utilization through physical encapsulation of nutrients, limited endogenous hydrolysis of β-mannans, increased digesta viscosity under some dietary conditions, and possible immune recognition of intact mannan structures.Ruminants are usually more tolerant of CM because rumen microorganisms can ferment fibrous substrates and convert part of dietary nitrogen into microbial protein.Nevertheless, residual lipid rich in lauric acid may alter rumen fermentation and methane formation, whereas higher CM exposureexcessive CM inclusion may reduce intake, fiber digestion, or nitrogen utilization.Processing strategies, including β-mannanase supplementation, pre-feed enzymatic hydrolysis, and solid-state fermentation, may improve nutrient availability and generate potentially functional oligosaccharides, but their effectiveness depends on CM composition and processing conditions and should be verified through digestible nutrient supply or animal performance.Current evidence supports the species-specific A c c e p t e d A r t i c l e use of well-characterized CM products rather than broad replacement of soybean meal or cereal ingredients with CM.Future research should establish processing-based quality standards and clarify digestible amino acid supply, ruminant protein value, and the functional effects of CM-derived products in well-characterized animal trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Bioscience
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.260440
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Copra meal in animal nutrition: nutritional constraints, processing strategies, and species-specific utilization

Weerada Meethip, Nittaya Taethaisong, Siwaporn Paengkoum, Pramote Paengkoum et al.
Animal Bioscience
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
article

Copra meal in animal nutrition: nutritional constraints, processing strategies, and species-specific utilization

Weerada Meethip, Nittaya Taethaisong, Siwaporn Paengkoum, Pramote Paengkoum, Lun Sun
article en

Abstract

Copra meal (CM), a co-product of coconut oil extraction, is a regionally important feed ingredient whose value cannot be judged from crude protein concentration alone.Its nutritional value is affected by drying and oil-extraction conditions, residual lipid content, mannan-rich cell-wall carbohydrates, and the digestive capacity of the target species.This review evaluates CM in poultry, swine, and ruminant diets, with emphasis on nutritional constraints, processing strategies, and species-specific utilization.Copra meal generally provides moderate crude protein, a low lysine-to-crude protein ratio, variable residual oil, and a carbohydrate fraction dominated by β-mannans, including galactomannans.In monogastric animals, these characteristics may restrict nutrient utilization through physical encapsulation of nutrients, limited endogenous hydrolysis of β-mannans, increased digesta viscosity under some dietary conditions, and possible immune recognition of intact mannan structures.Ruminants are usually more tolerant of CM because rumen microorganisms can ferment fibrous substrates and convert part of dietary nitrogen into microbial protein.Nevertheless, residual lipid rich in lauric acid may alter rumen fermentation and methane formation, whereas higher CM exposureexcessive CM inclusion may reduce intake, fiber digestion, or nitrogen utilization.Processing strategies, including β-mannanase supplementation, pre-feed enzymatic hydrolysis, and solid-state fermentation, may improve nutrient availability and generate potentially functional oligosaccharides, but their effectiveness depends on CM composition and processing conditions and should be verified through digestible nutrient supply or animal performance.Current evidence supports the species-specific A c c e p t e d A r t i c l e use of well-characterized CM products rather than broad replacement of soybean meal or cereal ingredients with CM.Future research should establish processing-based quality standards and clarify digestible amino acid supply, ruminant protein value, and the functional effects of CM-derived products in well-characterized animal trials.

Animal Bioscience
IE University (ES), Guizhou University (CN), Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University (TH), Suranaree University of Technology (TH)
Suranaree University of Technology, Thailand Science Research and Innovation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.