The Effects of Immediate Versus Delayed Timing of AI Support on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Performance: An Experimental Study

The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into second-language reading instruction has intensified debate regarding whether AI-mediated support facilitates comprehension or reduces the cognitive effort required for independent meaning construction. Although previous research has reported generally positive effects of AI-assisted reading, limited attention has been directed toward the timing of support during the reading process itself. The present study examined whether immediate versus delayed AI support produced different effects on EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance. A pretest–posttest experimental design was employed, involving 90 undergraduate EFL learners, randomly assigned to three instructional conditions: Immediate AI Support, Delayed AI Support, and No-Support control. The intervention was conducted over a ten-week period using AI-assisted reading tasks administered under controlled instructional conditions. Reading comprehension performance was measured using validated pre- and post-test instruments that assessed literal, inferential, and global comprehension. Psychometric validation procedures incorporating Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory supported the instrument’s reliability and measurement adequacy. One-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences across the three instructional conditions, F(2, 87) = 18.679, p < .001, η2 = 0.301. Post hoc comparisons demonstrated that learners receiving delayed AI support achieved significantly higher post-test reading comprehension scores than learners in both the immediate support and no support conditions. Learners receiving immediate AI support similarly outperformed the no-support group. The findings indicate that the effects of AI-assisted reading varied according to when explanatory support became available during the reading process. Delayed AI support produced stronger reading comprehension performance than immediate support and unsupported reading, suggesting that support timing constituted an important condition shaping comprehension performance in AI-mediated reading environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intelligence
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence14090199
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effects of Immediate Versus Delayed Timing of AI Support on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Performance: An Experimental Study

Wael Alharbi, Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh, Suheyla Demirkol Orak, Mayez Almayez
Journal of Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The Effects of Immediate Versus Delayed Timing of AI Support on EFL Learners’ Reading Comprehension Performance: An Experimental Study

Wael Alharbi, Mohammad Hamad Al-khresheh, Suheyla Demirkol Orak, Mayez Almayez
article en

Abstract

The growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into second-language reading instruction has intensified debate regarding whether AI-mediated support facilitates comprehension or reduces the cognitive effort required for independent meaning construction. Although previous research has reported generally positive effects of AI-assisted reading, limited attention has been directed toward the timing of support during the reading process itself. The present study examined whether immediate versus delayed AI support produced different effects on EFL learners’ reading comprehension performance. A pretest–posttest experimental design was employed, involving 90 undergraduate EFL learners, randomly assigned to three instructional conditions: Immediate AI Support, Delayed AI Support, and No-Support control. The intervention was conducted over a ten-week period using AI-assisted reading tasks administered under controlled instructional conditions. Reading comprehension performance was measured using validated pre- and post-test instruments that assessed literal, inferential, and global comprehension. Psychometric validation procedures incorporating Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory supported the instrument’s reliability and measurement adequacy. One-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences across the three instructional conditions, F(2, 87) = 18.679, p < .001, η2 = 0.301. Post hoc comparisons demonstrated that learners receiving delayed AI support achieved significantly higher post-test reading comprehension scores than learners in both the immediate support and no support conditions. Learners receiving immediate AI support similarly outperformed the no-support group. The findings indicate that the effects of AI-assisted reading varied according to when explanatory support became available during the reading process. Delayed AI support produced stronger reading comprehension performance than immediate support and unsupported reading, suggesting that support timing constituted an important condition shaping comprehension performance in AI-mediated reading environments.

Journal of IntelligenceVol. 14(9)
Northern Border University (SA), University of Turku (FI), Royal Commission for Jubail and Yanbu (SA), University of Ha'il (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.