Development and Preliminary Validation of the Resilience Among Adults With Diabetes Scale (RADS)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a theoretically informed instrument to measure diabetes-related resilience. Methods: Experts in diabetes self-management and resilience provided feedback on 55 candidate items. Factor structure and validity were examined using a sample of 255 adults with type 2 diabetes. Results: Expert feedback and exploratory factor analysis yielded a final scale of 15 items comprised of two factors: adaptability (α = .92) and determination (α = .87). Both subscales demonstrated good convergent validity with trait resilience ( r = .39 and r = .42). Both subscales showed emergent evidence of discriminant validity with measures of impression management ( r = .13, P = .061; r = .13, P = .047) but not of self-deceptive enhancement ( r s = .34 and .38, P < .001). Subscales demonstrated small to moderate correlations with diabetes self-management behaviors ( r s = .22-.40). Diabetes self-efficacy was positively correlated with adaptability ( r = .45, P < .001) and determination ( r = .56, P < .001) subscales. Conclusion: The factor structure is consistent with conceptualizations of resilience that emphasize active resistance and plasticity to stressors. The Resilience Among Adults With Diabetes Scale demonstrated good reliability and validity and may help identify patients who may benefit from tailored interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26350106261480077
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Preliminary Validation of the Resilience Among Adults With Diabetes Scale (RADS)

Katherine Nesbitt, Catherine Moring, Aaron A. Lee
The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Development and Preliminary Validation of the Resilience Among Adults With Diabetes Scale (RADS)

Katherine Nesbitt, Catherine Moring, Aaron A. Lee
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a theoretically informed instrument to measure diabetes-related resilience. Methods: Experts in diabetes self-management and resilience provided feedback on 55 candidate items. Factor structure and validity were examined using a sample of 255 adults with type 2 diabetes. Results: Expert feedback and exploratory factor analysis yielded a final scale of 15 items comprised of two factors: adaptability (α = .92) and determination (α = .87). Both subscales demonstrated good convergent validity with trait resilience ( r = .39 and r = .42). Both subscales showed emergent evidence of discriminant validity with measures of impression management ( r = .13, P = .061; r = .13, P = .047) but not of self-deceptive enhancement ( r s = .34 and .38, P < .001). Subscales demonstrated small to moderate correlations with diabetes self-management behaviors ( r s = .22-.40). Diabetes self-efficacy was positively correlated with adaptability ( r = .45, P < .001) and determination ( r = .56, P < .001) subscales. Conclusion: The factor structure is consistent with conceptualizations of resilience that emphasize active resistance and plasticity to stressors. The Resilience Among Adults With Diabetes Scale demonstrated good reliability and validity and may help identify patients who may benefit from tailored interventions.

The Science of Diabetes Self-Management and Care
University of Mississippi (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.