Graph-Enhanced Proximal Policy Optimization for Simulation-Based Point Cloud Coverage Planning on Curved Surfaces

This study examines the effects of graph aggregation and candidate-level scoring on PPO-based coverage planning for simulated curved point clouds. In a static uniform-coverage benchmark, a parameter-matched global MLP reaches 22.13% overall coverage, GCN-PPO reaches 76.97%, and Graph-Enhanced PPO reaches 88.37%; DFS remains the strongest at 95.80%. A separate 50-decision task introduces nonuniform priorities and motion costs. In that setting, GCN-PPO and Graph-Enhanced PPO obtain nearly identical weighted coverage (0.812 and 0.811, respectively), and no statistically reliable difference is detected. On a separate 1000-node scan-derived Stanford Bunny surface with retained holes and mesh-geodesic connectivity, GCN-PPO and Graph-Enhanced PPO again show comparable weighted coverage (0.450 and 0.445, respectively) and task utility (0.321 and 0.315, respectively), with no statistically reliable difference. Across the physically normalized zero-shot density and area tests, the direction of the small mean differences varies by condition, and none remain significant after multiplicity correction; both policies lose performance as the sampling density or workspace size changes. Direct adaptation on the known fivefold-area target graphs raises Graph-Enhanced PPO coverage from 0.631 to 0.753 for held-out starts. Because adaptation and evaluation use the same target graph instances, unseen large-graph generalization is not tested. Across the experiments, graph aggregation provides the clearest learned improvement. The auxiliary scorer improves the static benchmark result, but the added parameters prevent assigning that gain solely to a separate scoring mechanism; no consistent benefit appears in the other tests. Systematic traversal remains preferable when exhaustive uniform coverage is feasible. The study remains simulation-based: scan-derived geometry is evaluated, but validation on physical hardware is still required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Actuators
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/act15090466
Primary Topic
3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Graph-Enhanced Proximal Policy Optimization for Simulation-Based Point Cloud Coverage Planning on Curved Surfaces

Zhongxiang Chen, Zewu Li, Xingni Jiang, Zeng Feng et al.
Actuators
3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
article

Graph-Enhanced Proximal Policy Optimization for Simulation-Based Point Cloud Coverage Planning on Curved Surfaces

Zhongxiang Chen, Zewu Li, Xingni Jiang, Zeng Feng, Biju Yin
article en

Abstract

This study examines the effects of graph aggregation and candidate-level scoring on PPO-based coverage planning for simulated curved point clouds. In a static uniform-coverage benchmark, a parameter-matched global MLP reaches 22.13% overall coverage, GCN-PPO reaches 76.97%, and Graph-Enhanced PPO reaches 88.37%; DFS remains the strongest at 95.80%. A separate 50-decision task introduces nonuniform priorities and motion costs. In that setting, GCN-PPO and Graph-Enhanced PPO obtain nearly identical weighted coverage (0.812 and 0.811, respectively), and no statistically reliable difference is detected. On a separate 1000-node scan-derived Stanford Bunny surface with retained holes and mesh-geodesic connectivity, GCN-PPO and Graph-Enhanced PPO again show comparable weighted coverage (0.450 and 0.445, respectively) and task utility (0.321 and 0.315, respectively), with no statistically reliable difference. Across the physically normalized zero-shot density and area tests, the direction of the small mean differences varies by condition, and none remain significant after multiplicity correction; both policies lose performance as the sampling density or workspace size changes. Direct adaptation on the known fivefold-area target graphs raises Graph-Enhanced PPO coverage from 0.631 to 0.753 for held-out starts. Because adaptation and evaluation use the same target graph instances, unseen large-graph generalization is not tested. Across the experiments, graph aggregation provides the clearest learned improvement. The auxiliary scorer improves the static benchmark result, but the added parameters prevent assigning that gain solely to a separate scoring mechanism; no consistent benefit appears in the other tests. Systematic traversal remains preferable when exhaustive uniform coverage is feasible. The study remains simulation-based: scan-derived geometry is evaluated, but validation on physical hardware is still required.

ActuatorsVol. 15(9)
Hunan Normal University (CN), Sichuan University (CN), Changsha Normal University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.