Cardiac implantable electronic devices in heart failure: needs, challenges, and real-world implementation

Abstract Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are integral to heart failure (HF) management, providing therapies for bradyarrhythmias, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention, and remote monitoring. This review summarizes current and potential future indications, emerging technologies, and challenges in the implementation of CIEDs in HF. Conventional right ventricular pacing in HF patients is increasingly being replaced by biventricular pacing (BVP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), while leadless pacing pacemakers have emerged as an alternative to conventional transvenous systems, offering the potential to reduce lead- and device-related complications. As BVP remains the standard approach for CRT, recent data bestow LBBAP as a promising alternative and integration platform. Newer implantable cardioverter-defibrillator technologies, including subcutaneous and extravascular systems, may reduce lead-related complications while maintaining effective arrhythmia termination and recognition. Advances in atrial fibrillation management, implantable hemodynamic monitoring, and novel pacing indications such as atrioventricular recoupling and personalized pacing in HF with preserved ejection fraction are expanding the therapeutic potential of CIEDs. However, the adoption of these innovations is challenged by limited randomized evidence, procedural complexity, and substantial disparities in access and implementation across healthcare systems. Ongoing clinical trials will help define the role of emerging device technologies and monitoring strategies, while efforts to improve guideline adherence, value-based procurement, and equitable access remain essential to maximize the benefits of CIED therapy in patients with HF. Graphical abstract HF – heart failure; LVEF – left ventricular ejection fraction; BVP – biventricular pacing; CSP – conduction system pacing; LP – leadless pacing; LBBAP – left bundle branch area pacing; RCT – randomized clinical trial; HFrEF – heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; CRT – cardiac resynchronization therapy; LOT-CRT – left optimized resynchronization therapy; AF – atrial fibrillation; TV-ICD – transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillator; SCD – sudden cardiac death; HFpEF – heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heart Failure Reviews
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-026-10672-w
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Cardiac implantable electronic devices in heart failure: needs, challenges, and real-world implementation

Maja Ivanovski, Miha Mrak, David Žižek, Mitja Lainščak et al.
Heart Failure Reviews
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Cardiac implantable electronic devices in heart failure: needs, challenges, and real-world implementation

Maja Ivanovski, Miha Mrak, David Žižek, Mitja Lainščak, Mauro Biffi, Anja Zupan Mežnar, Christopher F. Barrientos, Zlatko Fras, Andrew P. Ambrosy, Tadej Žlahtič
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are integral to heart failure (HF) management, providing therapies for bradyarrhythmias, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention, and remote monitoring. This review summarizes current and potential future indications, emerging technologies, and challenges in the implementation of CIEDs in HF. Conventional right ventricular pacing in HF patients is increasingly being replaced by biventricular pacing (BVP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), while leadless pacing pacemakers have emerged as an alternative to conventional transvenous systems, offering the potential to reduce lead- and device-related complications. As BVP remains the standard approach for CRT, recent data bestow LBBAP as a promising alternative and integration platform. Newer implantable cardioverter-defibrillator technologies, including subcutaneous and extravascular systems, may reduce lead-related complications while maintaining effective arrhythmia termination and recognition. Advances in atrial fibrillation management, implantable hemodynamic monitoring, and novel pacing indications such as atrioventricular recoupling and personalized pacing in HF with preserved ejection fraction are expanding the therapeutic potential of CIEDs. However, the adoption of these innovations is challenged by limited randomized evidence, procedural complexity, and substantial disparities in access and implementation across healthcare systems. Ongoing clinical trials will help define the role of emerging device technologies and monitoring strategies, while efforts to improve guideline adherence, value-based procurement, and equitable access remain essential to maximize the benefits of CIED therapy in patients with HF. Graphical abstract HF – heart failure; LVEF – left ventricular ejection fraction; BVP – biventricular pacing; CSP – conduction system pacing; LP – leadless pacing; LBBAP – left bundle branch area pacing; RCT – randomized clinical trial; HFrEF – heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; CRT – cardiac resynchronization therapy; LOT-CRT – left optimized resynchronization therapy; AF – atrial fibrillation; TV-ICD – transvenous implantable cardiac defibrillator; SCD – sudden cardiac death; HFpEF – heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart Failure ReviewsVol. 31(1)
University of Ljubljana (SI), Ljubljana University Medical Centre (SI), Pomurski muzej Murska Sobota (SI), Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center (US)
Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.