Strategy-Oriented Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings: A Comprehensive Review and Decision-Support Framework

The seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings has become a major challenge in structural engineering due to the ageing of the global building stock, increasing seismic risk, and the growing demand for sustainable and resilient infrastructure. Although numerous retrofit techniques have been developed, most existing reviews classify solutions according to construction materials or individual technologies, providing limited guidance for selecting appropriate rehabilitation strategies in engineering practice. This review proposes a strategy-oriented framework that classifies seismic rehabilitation according to primary structural objectives rather than constituent materials. Five principal strategies are critically assessed: capacity enhancement, stiffness enhancement, ductility enhancement, seismic demand reduction, and hybrid rehabilitation. Their governing structural mechanisms, representative retrofit techniques, advantages, limitations, applicability, and sustainability implications are comparatively evaluated. Building on this classification, a decision-oriented framework is introduced that links structural typology, governing deficiencies, target performance objectives, rehabilitation strategies, and representative retrofit techniques, providing a structured basis for preliminary engineering decision-making before detailed structural design and verification. The review demonstrates that effective seismic rehabilitation depends primarily on the compatibility between the selected strategy and the characteristics and deficiencies of the existing structure rather than on any individual retrofit technique. It also highlights the growing importance of hybrid interventions, performance-based design, sustainability, functional recovery, and long-term resilience. By combining a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge with a strategy-oriented classification and practical decision-support framework, this review provides a structured methodology for comparing and selecting rehabilitation strategies across diverse building typologies and project-specific constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16173483
Primary Topic
Seismic Performance and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategy-Oriented Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings: A Comprehensive Review and Decision-Support Framework

Dorina Nicolina Isopescu, Alexandru Nicolae Bizu, Tiberiu Achiței
Buildings
Seismic Performance and Analysis
article

Strategy-Oriented Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings: A Comprehensive Review and Decision-Support Framework

Dorina Nicolina Isopescu, Alexandru Nicolae Bizu, Tiberiu Achiței
article en

Abstract

The seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings has become a major challenge in structural engineering due to the ageing of the global building stock, increasing seismic risk, and the growing demand for sustainable and resilient infrastructure. Although numerous retrofit techniques have been developed, most existing reviews classify solutions according to construction materials or individual technologies, providing limited guidance for selecting appropriate rehabilitation strategies in engineering practice. This review proposes a strategy-oriented framework that classifies seismic rehabilitation according to primary structural objectives rather than constituent materials. Five principal strategies are critically assessed: capacity enhancement, stiffness enhancement, ductility enhancement, seismic demand reduction, and hybrid rehabilitation. Their governing structural mechanisms, representative retrofit techniques, advantages, limitations, applicability, and sustainability implications are comparatively evaluated. Building on this classification, a decision-oriented framework is introduced that links structural typology, governing deficiencies, target performance objectives, rehabilitation strategies, and representative retrofit techniques, providing a structured basis for preliminary engineering decision-making before detailed structural design and verification. The review demonstrates that effective seismic rehabilitation depends primarily on the compatibility between the selected strategy and the characteristics and deficiencies of the existing structure rather than on any individual retrofit technique. It also highlights the growing importance of hybrid interventions, performance-based design, sustainability, functional recovery, and long-term resilience. By combining a comprehensive synthesis of current knowledge with a strategy-oriented classification and practical decision-support framework, this review provides a structured methodology for comparing and selecting rehabilitation strategies across diverse building typologies and project-specific constraints.

BuildingsVol. 16(17)
Academia Oamenilor de Știință din România (RO), Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iași (RO), Romanian Academy (RO)
Universitatea Tehnică „Gheorghe Asachi” din Iaşi
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Seismic Performance and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.