Comparison of high resolution model metocean conditions with in situ measurements and ECHOWAVE database around two European nearshore wind farms

In the present work, high resolution wind and wave model data, derived for the needs of metocean climate study for two European areas, are compared with existing in situ measurements and model results from ECHOWAVE coastal database. The data cover two nearshore areas in the Atlantic Ocean around two existing wind farms located in the North Sea (East Anglia One: EAO), and west of Portugal (WindFloat Atlantic: WFA). It is the first time that metocean conditions for these two areas have been produced at such a high spatial ( ∼ 1 km for wind and ∼ 100 m for waves) and temporal (1 hr) resolution for an extent of ten (10) years. For the generation of the model data, two regional numerical models, atmospheric model WRF and wave model SWAN, have been implemented using detailed geographical information acquired from EMODnet (European Marine Observation and Data network) database, and wind and wave boundary conditions from global database ERA5 (ECMWF Re-Analysis, v.5). Both model and measured wind and wave data have been statistically analysed, and compared against each other, using both standard and enhanced error metrics. Comparisons cover the seasonal variability, the directional behaviour, the probability structure, and the duration analysis of the data. Taking into account (a) the differences in the model databases (models used, grid resolution, boundary conditions, quality of geographical information etc.), (b) the various sources of uncertainties in measured data (different temporal extent, distance from the wind farm, missing values, different quality and sampling methods etc.), the presently derived datasets can be considered being in a good agreement with both in situ measurements and ECHOWAVE database.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Ocean Research
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2026.105234
Primary Topic
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparison of high resolution model metocean conditions with in situ measurements and ECHOWAVE database around two European nearshore wind farms

Christos Stefanakos, Øyvind Knutsen, Caio Fonteles, Iñigo Aguilera
Applied Ocean Research
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
article

Comparison of high resolution model metocean conditions with in situ measurements and ECHOWAVE database around two European nearshore wind farms

Christos Stefanakos, Øyvind Knutsen, Caio Fonteles, Iñigo Aguilera
article en

Abstract

In the present work, high resolution wind and wave model data, derived for the needs of metocean climate study for two European areas, are compared with existing in situ measurements and model results from ECHOWAVE coastal database. The data cover two nearshore areas in the Atlantic Ocean around two existing wind farms located in the North Sea (East Anglia One: EAO), and west of Portugal (WindFloat Atlantic: WFA). It is the first time that metocean conditions for these two areas have been produced at such a high spatial ( ∼ 1 km for wind and ∼ 100 m for waves) and temporal (1 hr) resolution for an extent of ten (10) years. For the generation of the model data, two regional numerical models, atmospheric model WRF and wave model SWAN, have been implemented using detailed geographical information acquired from EMODnet (European Marine Observation and Data network) database, and wind and wave boundary conditions from global database ERA5 (ECMWF Re-Analysis, v.5). Both model and measured wind and wave data have been statistically analysed, and compared against each other, using both standard and enhanced error metrics. Comparisons cover the seasonal variability, the directional behaviour, the probability structure, and the duration analysis of the data. Taking into account (a) the differences in the model databases (models used, grid resolution, boundary conditions, quality of geographical information etc.), (b) the various sources of uncertainties in measured data (different temporal extent, distance from the wind farm, missing values, different quality and sampling methods etc.), the presently derived datasets can be considered being in a good agreement with both in situ measurements and ECHOWAVE database.

Applied Ocean ResearchVol. 175
SINTEF (NO), Atlântica Instituto Universitário (PT)
HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.