International consensus statement on nasal septal perforation

BACKGROUND: Nasal septal perforation (NSP) is a multifactorial condition characterised by a full-thickness defect in the nasal septum, with clinical presentation ranging from asymptomatic cases to significant nasal obstruction, crusting, epistaxis, and impaired quality of life. A major challenge in NSP management is the absence of standardised diagnostic and therapeutic protocols, contributing to inconsistent outcomes. This study aimed to develop an international consensus on the assessment, classification, and management of NSP to standardise linical decision-making and improve patient care. METHODOLOGY: A modified Delphi process was conducted over three iterative rounds involving 25 panellists from 15 countries across four continents. Structured questionnaires addressing NSP diagnosis and management were developed, distributed, and refined. Statements covered eight categories: assessment; physiopathology and causes; position; dimensions; non-surgical treatment; surgical treatment, follow-up and results; and quality of life. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement, with no more than 10% disagreement. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 98.2% of the proposed statements. Fifty-six agreements included validated symptom assessment tools, imaging protocols, classification systems based on size and location, preferred medical and surgical treatments, perioperative care standards, and outcome evaluation methods. Areas without full consensus included the clinical relevance of superior-inferior perforation location, prognostic significance of mucosal oedema, the optimal abstinence period from intranasal drug use, and the necessity of early postoperative debridement. CONCLUSIONS: These expert consensus statements emphasise validated assessment tools, structured classification systems, and treatment approaches, providing a comprehensive framework to unify NSP management, guide future research, and improve patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Rhinology Journal
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4193/rhin26.027
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

International consensus statement on nasal septal perforation

Yj Jang, MJ Rojas-Lechuga, F Mariño-Sánchez, S Alsaleh et al.
Rhinology Journal
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
article

International consensus statement on nasal septal perforation

Yj Jang, MJ Rojas-Lechuga, F Mariño-Sánchez, S Alsaleh, I Alobid, S Gode, C Callejas, JD Bedoya, P Pegoraro, D Hanci, C Hopkins, JR Craig, A Alqahtani, AJ Psaltis, JC Ceballos, P Castelnuovo, S Delaney, M Tepedino, A Cordero, R Harvey, Y Rusetsky, A Obando, R Gohil, O Garaycochea, S Bansberg
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nasal septal perforation (NSP) is a multifactorial condition characterised by a full-thickness defect in the nasal septum, with clinical presentation ranging from asymptomatic cases to significant nasal obstruction, crusting, epistaxis, and impaired quality of life. A major challenge in NSP management is the absence of standardised diagnostic and therapeutic protocols, contributing to inconsistent outcomes. This study aimed to develop an international consensus on the assessment, classification, and management of NSP to standardise linical decision-making and improve patient care. METHODOLOGY: A modified Delphi process was conducted over three iterative rounds involving 25 panellists from 15 countries across four continents. Structured questionnaires addressing NSP diagnosis and management were developed, distributed, and refined. Statements covered eight categories: assessment; physiopathology and causes; position; dimensions; non-surgical treatment; surgical treatment, follow-up and results; and quality of life. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement, with no more than 10% disagreement. RESULTS: Consensus was reached for 98.2% of the proposed statements. Fifty-six agreements included validated symptom assessment tools, imaging protocols, classification systems based on size and location, preferred medical and surgical treatments, perioperative care standards, and outcome evaluation methods. Areas without full consensus included the clinical relevance of superior-inferior perforation location, prognostic significance of mucosal oedema, the optimal abstinence period from intranasal drug use, and the necessity of early postoperative debridement. CONCLUSIONS: These expert consensus statements emphasise validated assessment tools, structured classification systems, and treatment approaches, providing a comprehensive framework to unify NSP management, guide future research, and improve patient outcomes.

Rhinology JournalVol. 0(0)
University of Insubria (IT), Ulsan College (KR), NHS Lothian (GB), St Thomas' Hospital (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Instituto Cajal (ES), Ospedale di Circolo e Fondazione Macchi (IT), Asan Medical Center (KR), King Fahd Medical City (SA), UNSW Sydney (AU), Universidad de Antioquia (CO), University of Ulsan (KR), Ege University (TR), Hospital Quirón Teknon (ES), Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto (BR), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU), Centro Universitario Ciudad Vieja (GT), Central State Medical Academy (RU), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Instituto Oncológico de Córdoba (AR), Security Forces Hospital (SA), Centro Médico ABC (MX), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), Hospital Nacional de Niños (CR), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US), The University of Adelaide (AU), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG), Macquarie University (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.