Patterns of Osteoporosis Treatment Initiation Following Low‐Trauma Fracture: A Population‐Based Retrospective Cohort Study in New South Wales, Australia, Using Linked Administrative Health Data

OBJECTIVES: To characterise osteoporosis medicine prescribing patterns following low-trauma fractures and identify predictors of early treatment initiation. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective population-based cohort study. SETTING: New South Wales, Australia, using statewide linked administrative health data. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged ≥ 50 years with an incident low-trauma fracture between January 2011 and June 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were osteoporosis treatment prescribing patterns and timing of initiation after incident fracture over 3 years, categorised as early (within 12 months), late (within 1-3 years) or no initiation. Secondary analyses examined predictors of time to treatment initiation within 12 months using Fine-Gray competing-risk regression. RESULTS: Among 132,268 individuals with incident fractures, 63.7% (84,222) were female. Overall, 29,802 (22.5%) initiated osteoporosis medicine, whereas 102,466 (77.5%) remained untreated. Among females (mean [standard deviation] age, 77.7 [10.1] years), 20.1% initiated therapy within 12 months, 7.0% within 1-3 years, and 72.9% remained untreated. Among males (mean [standard deviation] age, 77.2 [10.0] years), the corresponding proportions were 10.8%, 3.7% and 85.6%. After accounting for the competing risk of death, treatment initiation was more likely with non-distal fractures, older age, polypharmacy, prior steroid use, prior dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and later fracture year, and less likely with greater comorbidity, rural or regional residence and prior hospitalisation for falls. The strongest associations were for hip or vertebral fracture (subdistribution hazard ratio range, 1.90-3.03) and high comorbidity burden (subdistribution hazard ratio range, 0.72-0.75). Almost one in four late initiators had a refracture before starting treatment. Denosumab rapidly replaced oral bisphosphonates as the dominant therapy over time. CONCLUSION: More than three-quarters of individuals remain untreated after fracture, highlighting persistent and substantial gaps in secondary fracture prevention. Treatment initiation is strongly associated with fracture site and multimorbidity burden, and initiation rates are lower in males. Increasing reliance on denosumab underscores the need for careful long-term treatment planning and strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Medical Journal of Australia
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70285
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patterns of Osteoporosis Treatment Initiation Following Low‐Trauma Fracture: A Population‐Based Retrospective Cohort Study in New South Wales, Australia, Using Linked Administrative Health Data

Dana Bliuc, Mike Lin, Thach Tran, Robert D. Blank et al.
The Medical Journal of Australia
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Patterns of Osteoporosis Treatment Initiation Following Low‐Trauma Fracture: A Population‐Based Retrospective Cohort Study in New South Wales, Australia, Using Linked Administrative Health Data

Dana Bliuc, Mike Lin, Thach Tran, Robert D. Blank, Huy Nguyen
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To characterise osteoporosis medicine prescribing patterns following low-trauma fractures and identify predictors of early treatment initiation. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective population-based cohort study. SETTING: New South Wales, Australia, using statewide linked administrative health data. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged ≥ 50 years with an incident low-trauma fracture between January 2011 and June 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were osteoporosis treatment prescribing patterns and timing of initiation after incident fracture over 3 years, categorised as early (within 12 months), late (within 1-3 years) or no initiation. Secondary analyses examined predictors of time to treatment initiation within 12 months using Fine-Gray competing-risk regression. RESULTS: Among 132,268 individuals with incident fractures, 63.7% (84,222) were female. Overall, 29,802 (22.5%) initiated osteoporosis medicine, whereas 102,466 (77.5%) remained untreated. Among females (mean [standard deviation] age, 77.7 [10.1] years), 20.1% initiated therapy within 12 months, 7.0% within 1-3 years, and 72.9% remained untreated. Among males (mean [standard deviation] age, 77.2 [10.0] years), the corresponding proportions were 10.8%, 3.7% and 85.6%. After accounting for the competing risk of death, treatment initiation was more likely with non-distal fractures, older age, polypharmacy, prior steroid use, prior dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and later fracture year, and less likely with greater comorbidity, rural or regional residence and prior hospitalisation for falls. The strongest associations were for hip or vertebral fracture (subdistribution hazard ratio range, 1.90-3.03) and high comorbidity burden (subdistribution hazard ratio range, 0.72-0.75). Almost one in four late initiators had a refracture before starting treatment. Denosumab rapidly replaced oral bisphosphonates as the dominant therapy over time. CONCLUSION: More than three-quarters of individuals remain untreated after fracture, highlighting persistent and substantial gaps in secondary fracture prevention. Treatment initiation is strongly associated with fracture site and multimorbidity burden, and initiation rates are lower in males. Increasing reliance on denosumab underscores the need for careful long-term treatment planning and strategies.

The Medical Journal of AustraliaVol. 224(9)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU), Bangor University (GB), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), St Vincent's Clinic (AU)
Amgen Foundation, Amgen, University of New South Wales, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council, Medical Research Future Fund
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.