Quantifying and explaining inequalities in drinking water quality access in remote and regional Australia

The quality of drinking water – encompassing both safety and acceptability – is essential for health and well-being, yet access remains inequitable across and within countries. We investigated inequalities in access to ‘good quality’ drinking water that fully complies with both health and aesthetic Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, for four Australian jurisdictions: the Northern Territory, South Australia, Victoria, and Western Australia using data from 2011 to 2023. Differences in the likelihood of accessing good-quality drinking water across communities under 10,000 in population were analysed using fixed-effects regression with panel data. We found that communities with smaller populations and more remote communities where First Peoples comprise most of the residents, experience a longer duration, and a greater likelihood not accessing good-quality drinking water. Our results are robust to different specifications and tests and highlight the urgent need for infrastructure funding, governance reforms and community-led partnerships to ensure good-quality drinking water for all Australians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Environmental Social Sciences
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44432-026-00007-3
Primary Topic
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Quantifying and explaining inequalities in drinking water quality access in remote and regional Australia

Nhat-Mai Nguyen, Paul R. Wyrwoll, R. Quentin Grafton, Long Chu et al.
npj Environmental Social Sciences
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
article

Quantifying and explaining inequalities in drinking water quality access in remote and regional Australia

Nhat-Mai Nguyen, Paul R. Wyrwoll, R. Quentin Grafton, Long Chu, Thi Ha Lien Le
article en

Abstract

The quality of drinking water – encompassing both safety and acceptability – is essential for health and well-being, yet access remains inequitable across and within countries. We investigated inequalities in access to ‘good quality’ drinking water that fully complies with both health and aesthetic Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, for four Australian jurisdictions: the Northern Territory, South Australia, Victoria, and Western Australia using data from 2011 to 2023. Differences in the likelihood of accessing good-quality drinking water across communities under 10,000 in population were analysed using fixed-effects regression with panel data. We found that communities with smaller populations and more remote communities where First Peoples comprise most of the residents, experience a longer duration, and a greater likelihood not accessing good-quality drinking water. Our results are robust to different specifications and tests and highlight the urgent need for infrastructure funding, governance reforms and community-led partnerships to ensure good-quality drinking water for all Australians.

npj Environmental Social SciencesVol. 1(1)
Australian National University (AU)
Equity Trustees, Australian National University, Australian Research Council
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
demographic modeling and climate adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.