Efficacy of nipocalimab in patients with moderate-to-severe ocular symptoms of generalized myasthenia gravis in the phase 3 Vivacity-MG3 study

BACKGROUND In the global Vivacity-MG3 study, nipocalimab (30-mg/kg loading dose; 15-mg/kg every-2-weeks) demonstrated sustained disease control versus placebo plus standard-of-care for generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG); this post-hoc analysis evaluated nipocalimab efficacy for participants with moderate-to-severe ocular symptoms (baseline score of ≥2-points on either ocular-domain item of MG-Activities-of-Daily-Living [MG-ADL]).RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Mean MG-ADL and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis total scores change-from-baseline (CFB) through Week (W)24 were assessed using ANCOVA. W24% of participants with ≥2-point improvement in MG-ADL total (meaningful-within-person-improvement) or ocular-domain scores were compared using odds ratios (OR). Longitudinal odds of ≥2-point ocular-domain improvement were evaluated using generalized-estimating-equations logistic models.RESULTS Nipocalimab (n = 54/77) and placebo-treated (n = 51/76) participants with moderate-to-severe ocular symptoms had similar baseline (mean[SD]) MG-ADL total (10.1[2.8];9.4[1.9]); ocular-domain scores were 4.1 (1.2);3.5 (1.0). At W24, LS-mean(SE) CFB for nipocalimab versus placebo were -4.71 (0.50) versus -3.24 (0.50), p = 0.042 (MG-ADL total) and median (IQR) -2.00 (-3.0 to -0.5) versus -1.00 (-1.5 to 0.0), p = 0.024 (ocular-domain). W24 ≥ 2-point ocular-domain improvements were observed with nipocalimab (40.7%) versus placebo (19.6%; OR = 3.47 [95% CI = 1.34-8.97]; p = 0.010). Adverse events: 77.8% (nipocalimab); 76.5% (placebo).CONCLUSION These hypothesis-generating results suggest nipocalimab may provide sustained disease control, reduce ocular symptoms, and improve activities-of-daily-living versus placebo in participants with gMG and moderate-to-severe ocular symptoms.Clinical trial registration www.clinicaltrials.govidentifier is NCT04951622;www.clinicaltrialsregister.euidentifier is 2020-005732-29

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Published
2026-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2026.2725147
Primary Topic
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Efficacy of nipocalimab in patients with moderate-to-severe ocular symptoms of generalized myasthenia gravis in the phase 3 Vivacity-MG3 study

Sindhu Ramchandren, Kristl G. Claeys, Ibrahim Turkoz, Sheryl Pease et al.
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
article

Efficacy of nipocalimab in patients with moderate-to-severe ocular symptoms of generalized myasthenia gravis in the phase 3 Vivacity-MG3 study

Sindhu Ramchandren, Kristl G. Claeys, Ibrahim Turkoz, Sheryl Pease, Kavita Gandhi, Huan Yang, Marie Fitzgibbon
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND In the global Vivacity-MG3 study, nipocalimab (30-mg/kg loading dose; 15-mg/kg every-2-weeks) demonstrated sustained disease control versus placebo plus standard-of-care for generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG); this post-hoc analysis evaluated nipocalimab efficacy for participants with moderate-to-severe ocular symptoms (baseline score of ≥2-points on either ocular-domain item of MG-Activities-of-Daily-Living [MG-ADL]).RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Mean MG-ADL and Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis total scores change-from-baseline (CFB) through Week (W)24 were assessed using ANCOVA. W24% of participants with ≥2-point improvement in MG-ADL total (meaningful-within-person-improvement) or ocular-domain scores were compared using odds ratios (OR). Longitudinal odds of ≥2-point ocular-domain improvement were evaluated using generalized-estimating-equations logistic models.RESULTS Nipocalimab (n = 54/77) and placebo-treated (n = 51/76) participants with moderate-to-severe ocular symptoms had similar baseline (mean[SD]) MG-ADL total (10.1[2.8];9.4[1.9]); ocular-domain scores were 4.1 (1.2);3.5 (1.0). At W24, LS-mean(SE) CFB for nipocalimab versus placebo were -4.71 (0.50) versus -3.24 (0.50), p = 0.042 (MG-ADL total) and median (IQR) -2.00 (-3.0 to -0.5) versus -1.00 (-1.5 to 0.0), p = 0.024 (ocular-domain). W24 ≥ 2-point ocular-domain improvements were observed with nipocalimab (40.7%) versus placebo (19.6%; OR = 3.47 [95% CI = 1.34-8.97]; p = 0.010). Adverse events: 77.8% (nipocalimab); 76.5% (placebo).CONCLUSION These hypothesis-generating results suggest nipocalimab may provide sustained disease control, reduce ocular symptoms, and improve activities-of-daily-living versus placebo in participants with gMG and moderate-to-severe ocular symptoms.Clinical trial registration www.clinicaltrials.govidentifier is NCT04951622;www.clinicaltrialsregister.euidentifier is 2020-005732-29

Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Central South University (CN), Xiangya Hospital Central South University (CN), KU Leuven (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Myasthenia Gravis and Thymoma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.