Resonance-enhanced evanescent optical lattices: comparison of guided-mode, surface-wave, and plasmonic platforms

Abstract Resonant diffraction by periodic photonic structures can generate strongly enhanced evanescent optical lattices near material interfaces. Here we compare this mechanism in three representative platforms: leaky guided modes, Bloch surface waves, and surface plasmon polaritons. Using Fourier modal method simulations and a semi-analytical nearest-neighbour model, we analyze linear, square, and hexagonal grating geometries under normally incident monochromatic illumination. The results show that the three platforms occupy distinct regimes of resonant near-field design. In the studied structures, leaky guided modes provide the largest resonant field enhancement and can yield very high absolute near-surface intensities, even when only a modest fraction of the stored intensity extends into the superstrate. Bloch-surface-wave and plasmonic lattices place their field maxima directly at the upper interface and can exhibit longer evanescent tails, but with platform-specific constraints such as multilayer coupling or metallic loss. We identify the trade-off between resonant enhancement, surface accessibility, penetration depth, visibility, and polarization response, providing design guidelines for structured near fields in nanophotonic sensing, microscopy, and surface-based light–matter interaction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-69031-2
Primary Topic
Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resonance-enhanced evanescent optical lattices: comparison of guided-mode, surface-wave, and plasmonic platforms

Andreas Norrman, Reuben Amedalor, M. Roussey, Atsu L. Asilevi et al.
Scientific Reports
Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
article

Resonance-enhanced evanescent optical lattices: comparison of guided-mode, surface-wave, and plasmonic platforms

Andreas Norrman, Reuben Amedalor, M. Roussey, Atsu L. Asilevi, Jari Turunen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Resonant diffraction by periodic photonic structures can generate strongly enhanced evanescent optical lattices near material interfaces. Here we compare this mechanism in three representative platforms: leaky guided modes, Bloch surface waves, and surface plasmon polaritons. Using Fourier modal method simulations and a semi-analytical nearest-neighbour model, we analyze linear, square, and hexagonal grating geometries under normally incident monochromatic illumination. The results show that the three platforms occupy distinct regimes of resonant near-field design. In the studied structures, leaky guided modes provide the largest resonant field enhancement and can yield very high absolute near-surface intensities, even when only a modest fraction of the stored intensity extends into the superstrate. Bloch-surface-wave and plasmonic lattices place their field maxima directly at the upper interface and can exhibit longer evanescent tails, but with platform-specific constraints such as multilayer coupling or metallic loss. We identify the trade-off between resonant enhancement, surface accessibility, penetration depth, visibility, and polarization response, providing design guidelines for structured near fields in nanophotonic sensing, microscopy, and surface-based light–matter interaction.

Scientific Reports
University of Eastern Finland (FI)
Itä-Suomen Yliopisto, Academy of Finland
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.