Prediction of Ki-67 Status in Breast Cancer Using a Habitat-Guided 2.5D Multiparametric MRI Deep Learning Model

OBJECTIVE: Intratumoral heterogeneity may limit the representativeness of biopsy-based Ki-67 assessment in breast cancer. We therefore developed and validated a habitat-guided 2.5D deep learning (DL) model based on multiparametric MRI for noninvasive preoperative prediction of high versus low Ki-67 expression. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 333 patients with invasive breast carcinoma from 2 distinct MRI vendor cohorts (Siemens, training set, n=233; United Imaging, independent test set, n=100). All patients underwent preoperative multiparametric MRI, including DCE-MRI and DWI. Hemodynamic parametric maps (wash-in, wash-out) and ADC maps were generated and subsequently clustered using a K-means algorithm (k=3) to create a functional habitat mask that quantitatively encodes intratumoral heterogeneity. A 7-channel 2.5D input tensor was then constructed by concatenating the central habitat-guided slice with its 6 adjacent anatomic slices. A ResNet18 backbone was trained to classify high (≥20%) versus low Ki-67 expression. The model's performance was rigorously evaluated against conventional 2D DL, clinical, and combined (DL+clinical) models using AUC, the DeLong test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: In the challenging independent cross-vendor test set, our habitat-guided DL25D model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.821 (95% CI: 0.736-0.906) and a sensitivity of 0.804. It significantly outperformed both the conventional DL2D model (AUC: 0.654, P=0.002) and the clinical model (AUC: 0.686, P=0.019). The incorporation of clinical variables failed to yield further improvement (combined model AUC: 0.837, P=0.483 vs. DL25D; NRI=0.021, P>0.05). DCA confirmed the superior net clinical benefit of our approach across a wide spectrum of threshold probabilities. Importantly, Grad-CAM visualizations revealed that the habitat-guided model strategically focused its attention on intratumoral core regions, whereas the conventional 2D model was distracted by tumor margins and background tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The habitat-guided 2.5D deep learning model showed potential as a noninvasive imaging adjunct for preoperative Ki-67 status prediction in breast cancer. Multicenter prospective validation is required before clinical use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0000000000001923
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of Ki-67 Status in Breast Cancer Using a Habitat-Guided 2.5D Multiparametric MRI Deep Learning Model

Guanwu Li, Zeyang Miao, 方旭婷, Mengyao Guo et al.
Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Prediction of Ki-67 Status in Breast Cancer Using a Habitat-Guided 2.5D Multiparametric MRI Deep Learning Model

Guanwu Li, Zeyang Miao, 方旭婷, Mengyao Guo, Peng Luo, Run Xu, Hong Chen, Qiong Li
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Intratumoral heterogeneity may limit the representativeness of biopsy-based Ki-67 assessment in breast cancer. We therefore developed and validated a habitat-guided 2.5D deep learning (DL) model based on multiparametric MRI for noninvasive preoperative prediction of high versus low Ki-67 expression. METHODS: This retrospective study enrolled 333 patients with invasive breast carcinoma from 2 distinct MRI vendor cohorts (Siemens, training set, n=233; United Imaging, independent test set, n=100). All patients underwent preoperative multiparametric MRI, including DCE-MRI and DWI. Hemodynamic parametric maps (wash-in, wash-out) and ADC maps were generated and subsequently clustered using a K-means algorithm (k=3) to create a functional habitat mask that quantitatively encodes intratumoral heterogeneity. A 7-channel 2.5D input tensor was then constructed by concatenating the central habitat-guided slice with its 6 adjacent anatomic slices. A ResNet18 backbone was trained to classify high (≥20%) versus low Ki-67 expression. The model's performance was rigorously evaluated against conventional 2D DL, clinical, and combined (DL+clinical) models using AUC, the DeLong test, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: In the challenging independent cross-vendor test set, our habitat-guided DL25D model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.821 (95% CI: 0.736-0.906) and a sensitivity of 0.804. It significantly outperformed both the conventional DL2D model (AUC: 0.654, P=0.002) and the clinical model (AUC: 0.686, P=0.019). The incorporation of clinical variables failed to yield further improvement (combined model AUC: 0.837, P=0.483 vs. DL25D; NRI=0.021, P>0.05). DCA confirmed the superior net clinical benefit of our approach across a wide spectrum of threshold probabilities. Importantly, Grad-CAM visualizations revealed that the habitat-guided model strategically focused its attention on intratumoral core regions, whereas the conventional 2D model was distracted by tumor margins and background tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The habitat-guided 2.5D deep learning model showed potential as a noninvasive imaging adjunct for preoperative Ki-67 status prediction in breast cancer. Multicenter prospective validation is required before clinical use.

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Yueyang Hospital (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.