High-intensity treatment is common at the end of life among children and young people who died of cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Annually, approximately 500 children and young people (aged <25 years) with cancer die in England. Little is known about the intensity of their end-of-life care. AIM: The primary aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of high-intensity treatment at the end of life in England and assess the relationship between high-intensity treatment and palliative care integration in main cancer treatment centres. The secondary aim was to assess the relationship between palliative care integration and place of death. DESIGN: Retrospective, national full-population cohort study. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: English Cancer Registry data with linked hospitalisation, treatment and intensive care data were used to define a cohort aged <25 years who died in 2012-2020 and post-cancer diagnosis. High-intensity treatment was defined as any intravenous chemotherapy within 14 days of death or multiple hospitalisations, emergency department visits or any intensive care unit admission within 30 days of death. High-intensity treatment prevalence at the end of life and place of death were summarised by demographics, cancer type, main treatment centre and centre-level integration of palliative care. Logistic regression models explored associations with high-intensity treatment. RESULTS: 2208 (52%) of the cohort (n=4247) had high-intensity treatments at the end of life and 1911 (45%) died in hospital. High-intensity treatment prevalence varied by age at death and cancer type. There was no evidence of health inequalities in treatments, but minority ethnic groups and those living in more deprived areas had greater odds of dying in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity treatment is common at the end of life among children and young people with cancer; however, its appropriateness is difficult to evaluate. Nevertheless, no evidence of health inequalities was noted, and hospital deaths remain most common.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Paediatrics Open
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2026-004575
Primary Topic
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

High-intensity treatment is common at the end of life among children and young people who died of cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Lorna Fraser, Stuart Jarvis, Bob Phillips, Richard Feltbower et al.
BMJ Paediatrics Open
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
article

High-intensity treatment is common at the end of life among children and young people who died of cancer: a retrospective cohort study

Lorna Fraser, Stuart Jarvis, Bob Phillips, Richard Feltbower, Sebastian Hinde, Helen Weatherly, Pandell Damun, Gayathri Subramanian
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Annually, approximately 500 children and young people (aged <25 years) with cancer die in England. Little is known about the intensity of their end-of-life care. AIM: The primary aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of high-intensity treatment at the end of life in England and assess the relationship between high-intensity treatment and palliative care integration in main cancer treatment centres. The secondary aim was to assess the relationship between palliative care integration and place of death. DESIGN: Retrospective, national full-population cohort study. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: English Cancer Registry data with linked hospitalisation, treatment and intensive care data were used to define a cohort aged <25 years who died in 2012-2020 and post-cancer diagnosis. High-intensity treatment was defined as any intravenous chemotherapy within 14 days of death or multiple hospitalisations, emergency department visits or any intensive care unit admission within 30 days of death. High-intensity treatment prevalence at the end of life and place of death were summarised by demographics, cancer type, main treatment centre and centre-level integration of palliative care. Logistic regression models explored associations with high-intensity treatment. RESULTS: 2208 (52%) of the cohort (n=4247) had high-intensity treatments at the end of life and 1911 (45%) died in hospital. High-intensity treatment prevalence varied by age at death and cancer type. There was no evidence of health inequalities in treatments, but minority ethnic groups and those living in more deprived areas had greater odds of dying in hospital. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity treatment is common at the end of life among children and young people with cancer; however, its appropriateness is difficult to evaluate. Nevertheless, no evidence of health inequalities was noted, and hospital deaths remain most common.

BMJ Paediatrics OpenVol. 10(1)
University of Leeds (GB), King's College London (GB), Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Cicely Saunders International (GB), University of York (GB), Hull York Medical School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.