Current Musculoskeletal Pain and Injury History in Former NCAA Division I Female Athletes

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of current musculoskeletal pain among former NCAA Division I female athletes and examine associations with prior injury history, anatomical distribution of symptoms, and functional outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional web-based survey of former NCAA Division I female athletes. Participants completed questionnaires regarding athletic history, prior injuries, current pain, osteoarthritis diagnosis, physical activity, and PROMIS Pain Interference outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 428 former NCAA Division I female athletes were included, of whom 305 (71.3%) reported current musculoskeletal pain. Athletes with pain were more likely to report injuries before college (71% vs. 46%), injuries during college (80% vs. 62%), continued training despite injury (73% vs. 55%), career-ending injuries (8.5% vs. 1.6%), and prior NSAID use (72% vs. 54%) (all P≤0.008). Pre-collegiate injury (adjusted OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.72-4.68) and career-ending injury (adjusted OR 4.85, 95% CI 1.10-21.45) independently predicted current pain. Current pain was concentrated primarily in the knee, spine, and hip/pelvis. Despite frequent symptoms, 94% of participants remained physically active. CONCLUSION: Persistent musculoskeletal pain is common among former NCAA Division I female athletes and is associated with cumulative injury burden. Longitudinal studies are needed to better understand musculoskeletal health across the female athletic lifespan.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/phm.0000000000003149
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Current Musculoskeletal Pain and Injury History in Former NCAA Division I Female Athletes

Miguel X. Escalón, Katharine Holmes, Rebecca Maitin, Irene Kalbian
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Current Musculoskeletal Pain and Injury History in Former NCAA Division I Female Athletes

Miguel X. Escalón, Katharine Holmes, Rebecca Maitin, Irene Kalbian
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of current musculoskeletal pain among former NCAA Division I female athletes and examine associations with prior injury history, anatomical distribution of symptoms, and functional outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional web-based survey of former NCAA Division I female athletes. Participants completed questionnaires regarding athletic history, prior injuries, current pain, osteoarthritis diagnosis, physical activity, and PROMIS Pain Interference outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 428 former NCAA Division I female athletes were included, of whom 305 (71.3%) reported current musculoskeletal pain. Athletes with pain were more likely to report injuries before college (71% vs. 46%), injuries during college (80% vs. 62%), continued training despite injury (73% vs. 55%), career-ending injuries (8.5% vs. 1.6%), and prior NSAID use (72% vs. 54%) (all P≤0.008). Pre-collegiate injury (adjusted OR 2.84, 95% CI 1.72-4.68) and career-ending injury (adjusted OR 4.85, 95% CI 1.10-21.45) independently predicted current pain. Current pain was concentrated primarily in the knee, spine, and hip/pelvis. Despite frequent symptoms, 94% of participants remained physically active. CONCLUSION: Persistent musculoskeletal pain is common among former NCAA Division I female athletes and is associated with cumulative injury burden. Longitudinal studies are needed to better understand musculoskeletal health across the female athletic lifespan.

American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.