Danish Pancreatic Cancer Group consensus guidelines on the management of pancreatic IPMN

BackgroundIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are the most common pancreatic cystic neoplasms and are increasingly detected incidentally. Although they carry malignant potential, most lesions follow an indolent course, creating a clinical challenge in balancing early cancer detection with the risks of overtreatment. Existing international guidelines differ in surveillance strategies, thresholds for intervention, and recommendations for discontinuation.PurposeTo present Danish multidisciplinary consensus recommendations for the evaluation, surveillance, and management of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.Material and MethodsThe Danish Pancreatic Cancer Group consensus was developed by a multidisciplinary working group comprising radiologists and pancreatic surgeons. Recommendations were based on a narrative review of the literature, existing international guidelines, and clinical experience within a centralized healthcare setting. Consensus was achieved through iterative discussions without a formal Delphi process.RecommendationsMagnetic resonance imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP) is recommended as the primary modality for diagnosis and surveillance, with computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound used selectively. Risk stratification is based on high-risk stigmata and worrisome features, with emphasis on interval changes during follow-up. Surveillance strategies are primarily size-based and individualized according to patient age, comorbidities, and surgical eligibility. Surgical evaluation is recommended for cysts larger than 30 mm and for main-duct or mixed-type IPMNs with high-risk features, while a more selective approach is applied to branch-duct IPMN. Discontinuation of surveillance is supported in selected patients with stable disease, particularly in older individuals.ConclusionThe Danish multidisciplinary consensus provides a pragmatic, risk-adapted approach to IPMN management, emphasizing individualized care, multidisciplinary decision-making, and avoidance of unnecessary investigations and surgical overtreatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Radiologica
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851261477089
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Danish Pancreatic Cancer Group consensus guidelines on the management of pancreatic IPMN

Bahareh Abdolalizadeh, Claus Wilki Fristrup, Caroline Ewertsen, Eva Fallentin et al.
Acta Radiologica
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Danish Pancreatic Cancer Group consensus guidelines on the management of pancreatic IPMN

Bahareh Abdolalizadeh, Claus Wilki Fristrup, Caroline Ewertsen, Eva Fallentin, Lars Peter Larsen
article en

Abstract

BackgroundIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are the most common pancreatic cystic neoplasms and are increasingly detected incidentally. Although they carry malignant potential, most lesions follow an indolent course, creating a clinical challenge in balancing early cancer detection with the risks of overtreatment. Existing international guidelines differ in surveillance strategies, thresholds for intervention, and recommendations for discontinuation.PurposeTo present Danish multidisciplinary consensus recommendations for the evaluation, surveillance, and management of pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.Material and MethodsThe Danish Pancreatic Cancer Group consensus was developed by a multidisciplinary working group comprising radiologists and pancreatic surgeons. Recommendations were based on a narrative review of the literature, existing international guidelines, and clinical experience within a centralized healthcare setting. Consensus was achieved through iterative discussions without a formal Delphi process.RecommendationsMagnetic resonance imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP) is recommended as the primary modality for diagnosis and surveillance, with computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound used selectively. Risk stratification is based on high-risk stigmata and worrisome features, with emphasis on interval changes during follow-up. Surveillance strategies are primarily size-based and individualized according to patient age, comorbidities, and surgical eligibility. Surgical evaluation is recommended for cysts larger than 30 mm and for main-duct or mixed-type IPMNs with high-risk features, while a more selective approach is applied to branch-duct IPMN. Discontinuation of surveillance is supported in selected patients with stable disease, particularly in older individuals.ConclusionThe Danish multidisciplinary consensus provides a pragmatic, risk-adapted approach to IPMN management, emphasizing individualized care, multidisciplinary decision-making, and avoidance of unnecessary investigations and surgical overtreatment.

Acta Radiologica
University of Copenhagen (DK), Odense University Hospital (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Copenhagen University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.