Fragmented versus traditional resistance training: a randomized controlled trial on muscular strength, endurance, and enjoyment in recreationally trained young adults

Traditional resistance training requires prolonged continuous sessions, which may limit participation among time-constrained individuals. Fragmented resistance training (FRT), derived from ‘exercise snacking,’ may offer a more flexible alternative, but comparative evidence with traditional resistance training (TRT) remains limited. This study examined the effects of 8 weeks of FRT and TRT on muscular fitness and exercise enjoyment in 45 recreationally trained male students (18–25 years, ≥6 months training). Participants were randomised to FRT (three daily short bouts, 1×20 squats each), TRT (one continuous session, 3×20 squats), or a time-matched control group. Training was performed three times/week for 8 weeks using Smith-machine squats, with volume matched and intensity progressing from 40% to 55% of 1RM. Outcomes included 1RM strength, isometric squat force, relative muscular endurance (repetitions at 40% of current 1RM), and PACES enjoyment. Both FRT and TRT significantly outperformed the control in 1RM strength (FRT: +20.59 kg [8.69–32.49], p < 0.001; TRT: +28.93 kg [17.05–40.82], p < 0.001), isometric squat force (FRT: +27.89 kgf [12.15–43.64], p < 0.001; TRT: +35.24 kgf [19.48–51.00], p < 0.001) and relative muscular endurance (FRT: +9.97 repetitions [1.68–18.27], p = 0.020; TRT: +14.11 repetitions [5.84–22.38], p < 0.001), with no significant differences between FRT and TRT group (p = 0.164, 0.353 and 0.320). FRT reported significantly higher enjoyment than TRT (p = 0.034). These findings suggest FRT and TRT produce comparable improvements in strength and endurance under volume-matched conditions, both superior to control. FRT was more enjoyable, indicating it may serve as a practical alternative for time-constrained young adults, though further research on long-term adherence is warranted. Clinical Trial Registration : Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500115052.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2026.200521
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fragmented versus traditional resistance training: a randomized controlled trial on muscular strength, endurance, and enjoyment in recreationally trained young adults

Xudong Wu, Rongxuan Zhai, Lejun Wang, Yushan Jiang et al.
Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness
Sports Performance and Training
article

Fragmented versus traditional resistance training: a randomized controlled trial on muscular strength, endurance, and enjoyment in recreationally trained young adults

Xudong Wu, Rongxuan Zhai, Lejun Wang, Yushan Jiang, Yulu Wang, Hanya Dai, Kunnian Yang
article en

Abstract

Traditional resistance training requires prolonged continuous sessions, which may limit participation among time-constrained individuals. Fragmented resistance training (FRT), derived from ‘exercise snacking,’ may offer a more flexible alternative, but comparative evidence with traditional resistance training (TRT) remains limited. This study examined the effects of 8 weeks of FRT and TRT on muscular fitness and exercise enjoyment in 45 recreationally trained male students (18–25 years, ≥6 months training). Participants were randomised to FRT (three daily short bouts, 1×20 squats each), TRT (one continuous session, 3×20 squats), or a time-matched control group. Training was performed three times/week for 8 weeks using Smith-machine squats, with volume matched and intensity progressing from 40% to 55% of 1RM. Outcomes included 1RM strength, isometric squat force, relative muscular endurance (repetitions at 40% of current 1RM), and PACES enjoyment. Both FRT and TRT significantly outperformed the control in 1RM strength (FRT: +20.59 kg [8.69–32.49], p < 0.001; TRT: +28.93 kg [17.05–40.82], p < 0.001), isometric squat force (FRT: +27.89 kgf [12.15–43.64], p < 0.001; TRT: +35.24 kgf [19.48–51.00], p < 0.001) and relative muscular endurance (FRT: +9.97 repetitions [1.68–18.27], p = 0.020; TRT: +14.11 repetitions [5.84–22.38], p < 0.001), with no significant differences between FRT and TRT group (p = 0.164, 0.353 and 0.320). FRT reported significantly higher enjoyment than TRT (p = 0.034). These findings suggest FRT and TRT produce comparable improvements in strength and endurance under volume-matched conditions, both superior to control. FRT was more enjoyable, indicating it may serve as a practical alternative for time-constrained young adults, though further research on long-term adherence is warranted. Clinical Trial Registration : Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2500115052.

Journal of Exercise Science & FitnessVol. 24(4)
Shanghai University (CN), Shanghai University of Engineering Science (CN), Shanghai Sunshine Rehabilitation Center (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.