Cancer rarity and mortality: Evidence from a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND: Patients with rare cancers have consistently been reported to have poorer survival than patients with common cancers. We hypothesized that the excess mortality could be attributable to differences in tumor histology and stage at diagnosis and, explored whether it reflected a broader relationship between cancer incidence and mortality. METHODS: In a nationwide, population-based cohort study, we included adults diagnosed with a first primary solid malignant tumor in Denmark between 2004 and 2023. Cancers were classified according to Tier 2 of the RARECAREnet classification (rare cancer: incidence <6/100.000). Hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality according to rarity were estimated using Cox regression adjusted for age, sex and calendar period. Additional analyses further adjusted for tumor histology and stage at diagnosis. Tumor entities were also grouped into six incidence categories to examine survival across the incidence continuum. RESULTS: 20.6% of cancer patients were diagnosed with a rare cancer. Patients with rare cancers had a 74% higher mortality than those with common cancers (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.72 to 1.76), but mortality did not generally increase with increasing rarity. After adjustment for tumor histology and stage at diagnosis, the HR was close to unity (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.98). CONCLUSION: Patients with rare cancers experienced higher mortality than those with common cancers. The excess mortality was attenuated after adjustment for tumor histology and stage at diagnosis, indicating that these factors largely explain the survival disadvantage in rare cancers. Improving outcomes for patients with rare cancers should focus on earlier diagnosis and tumor-specific management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djag308
Primary Topic
Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cancer rarity and mortality: Evidence from a nationwide cohort study

Jan Wohlfahrt, Trille Kristina Kjær, Simon Konig, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton et al.
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
article

Cancer rarity and mortality: Evidence from a nationwide cohort study

Jan Wohlfahrt, Trille Kristina Kjær, Simon Konig, Susanne Oksbjerg Dalton, Mia Klinten Grand, Søren Friis, Jane Christensen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with rare cancers have consistently been reported to have poorer survival than patients with common cancers. We hypothesized that the excess mortality could be attributable to differences in tumor histology and stage at diagnosis and, explored whether it reflected a broader relationship between cancer incidence and mortality. METHODS: In a nationwide, population-based cohort study, we included adults diagnosed with a first primary solid malignant tumor in Denmark between 2004 and 2023. Cancers were classified according to Tier 2 of the RARECAREnet classification (rare cancer: incidence <6/100.000). Hazard ratios (HRs) of all-cause mortality according to rarity were estimated using Cox regression adjusted for age, sex and calendar period. Additional analyses further adjusted for tumor histology and stage at diagnosis. Tumor entities were also grouped into six incidence categories to examine survival across the incidence continuum. RESULTS: 20.6% of cancer patients were diagnosed with a rare cancer. Patients with rare cancers had a 74% higher mortality than those with common cancers (HR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.72 to 1.76), but mortality did not generally increase with increasing rarity. After adjustment for tumor histology and stage at diagnosis, the HR was close to unity (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.98). CONCLUSION: Patients with rare cancers experienced higher mortality than those with common cancers. The excess mortality was attenuated after adjustment for tumor histology and stage at diagnosis, indicating that these factors largely explain the survival disadvantage in rare cancers. Improving outcomes for patients with rare cancers should focus on earlier diagnosis and tumor-specific management.

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
University of Copenhagen (DK), Zealand University Hospital (DK), Danish Cancer Society (DK), Aalborg University (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.