Evaluation of in vivo subject-specific mechanical behavior of lamina cribrosa in subjects with and without glaucoma

Subject-specific finite element models were developed for 20 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and 20 control eyes using swept-source OCT. The spatial distribution of tensile and compressive strains was computed across the lamina cribrosa. POAG subjects exhibited significantly higher compressive (-0.84 ± 0.15 vs -0.54 ± 0.16) and tensile strains (0.72 ± 0.12 vs 0.54 ± 0.08, p-value < 0.0001). Localized strains within the temporal and superior regions were identified as primary mechanical features distinguishing both among POAG subgroups and between POAG and control subjects. Significant correlation was found between features of strain distribution and visual field mean deviation (p-value < 0.05), defining POAG subgroups that may reflect different POAG mechanical phenotypes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2026.2725230
Primary Topic
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of in vivo subject-specific mechanical behavior of lamina cribrosa in subjects with and without glaucoma

Chhavi Saini, Lucy Q. Shen, John C. Brigham, Soumaya Ouhsousou et al.
Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
article

Evaluation of in vivo subject-specific mechanical behavior of lamina cribrosa in subjects with and without glaucoma

Chhavi Saini, Lucy Q. Shen, John C. Brigham, Soumaya Ouhsousou, Mengyu Wang
article en

Abstract

Subject-specific finite element models were developed for 20 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and 20 control eyes using swept-source OCT. The spatial distribution of tensile and compressive strains was computed across the lamina cribrosa. POAG subjects exhibited significantly higher compressive (-0.84 ± 0.15 vs -0.54 ± 0.16) and tensile strains (0.72 ± 0.12 vs 0.54 ± 0.08, p-value < 0.0001). Localized strains within the temporal and superior regions were identified as primary mechanical features distinguishing both among POAG subgroups and between POAG and control subjects. Significant correlation was found between features of strain distribution and visual field mean deviation (p-value < 0.05), defining POAG subgroups that may reflect different POAG mechanical phenotypes.

Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US), Harvard University (US), University of Pittsburgh (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Glaucoma and retinal disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.