Volume Out of Place: Governing and Containing Coastal Contradiction

This article examines how environmental governance in coastal Louisiana mediates the contradictions of development, land loss and restoration through volumetric regulatory regimes. Focusing on efforts to channel and contain oil, gas, sediment, grain, water and pollution, it argues that permitting frameworks treat development and restoration as discrete and governable interventions into the voluminous space of the coast. Ethnographic research conducted with environmental scientists and community organisers illuminates the ways this separation stabilises the coast for capital, authorising certain thresholds of degradation or destruction while rendering their cumulative effects external, accidental, or ‘out of place’. This analysis centres two interwoven cases: efforts to document pollution following Hurricane Ida in 2021, when catastrophic storm damage exposed the leakiness already built into regulatory systems; and opposition in a historically Black community to a proposed grain elevator. In both cases, permitting processes emerge as sites where the limits of volumetric governance are contested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anthropological Forum
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2026.2723785
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Volume Out of Place: Governing and Containing Coastal Contradiction

S.A. Moore
Anthropological Forum
Coastal and Marine Management
article

Volume Out of Place: Governing and Containing Coastal Contradiction

S.A. Moore
article en

Abstract

This article examines how environmental governance in coastal Louisiana mediates the contradictions of development, land loss and restoration through volumetric regulatory regimes. Focusing on efforts to channel and contain oil, gas, sediment, grain, water and pollution, it argues that permitting frameworks treat development and restoration as discrete and governable interventions into the voluminous space of the coast. Ethnographic research conducted with environmental scientists and community organisers illuminates the ways this separation stabilises the coast for capital, authorising certain thresholds of degradation or destruction while rendering their cumulative effects external, accidental, or ‘out of place’. This analysis centres two interwoven cases: efforts to document pollution following Hurricane Ida in 2021, when catastrophic storm damage exposed the leakiness already built into regulatory systems; and opposition in a historically Black community to a proposed grain elevator. In both cases, permitting processes emerge as sites where the limits of volumetric governance are contested.

Anthropological Forum
Columbia University (US)
Fonds de recherche du Québec
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.