Pain in laboratory fishes: What we know and what we need to know

The scientific exploration of the capacity of fishes to experience pain has grown since the first identification of nociceptors in rainbow trout in 2002. In the early years up to 2010 anatomical and electrophysiological evidence was gathered that demonstrated that the characteristics of peripheral and central nervous system responses were comparable to mammals. Combined with behavioural investigations where fishes exhibited anomalous responses to painful treatment that were ameliorated by pain-relieving drugs subsequent studies were fuelled by this convincing evidence. More contemporary studies have explored several species and investigated a wider variety of pain types, with zebrafish proposed as a model for the study of nociception and pain. Both operational and laboratory welfare indicators are detailed for several species which can be evaluated by the tank side or by additional behavioural scoring software and laboratory equipment. Even with this progress over the last 24 years many aspects still need to be uncovered. For efficient pain management for fishes used in science, a wider range of species need to be assessed during invasive procedures; the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of pain-relieving drugs must be elucidated so scientists can make informed choices, as well as identifying any possible side-effects; combinatorial strategies where more than one drug is administered at lower doses to reduce side-effects should be investigated; and pain assessment tools using intensity scales or monitoring using artificial intelligence evaluation software provides promise as an aid to identifying pain and allowing researchers to intervene to improve fish welfare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Laboratory Animals
Published
2026-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00236772261474220
Primary Topic
Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Pain in laboratory fishes: What we know and what we need to know

Lisa Carlsson, Lynne U. Sneddon, Ana M. Valentim
Laboratory Animals
Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
article

Pain in laboratory fishes: What we know and what we need to know

Lisa Carlsson, Lynne U. Sneddon, Ana M. Valentim
article en

Abstract

The scientific exploration of the capacity of fishes to experience pain has grown since the first identification of nociceptors in rainbow trout in 2002. In the early years up to 2010 anatomical and electrophysiological evidence was gathered that demonstrated that the characteristics of peripheral and central nervous system responses were comparable to mammals. Combined with behavioural investigations where fishes exhibited anomalous responses to painful treatment that were ameliorated by pain-relieving drugs subsequent studies were fuelled by this convincing evidence. More contemporary studies have explored several species and investigated a wider variety of pain types, with zebrafish proposed as a model for the study of nociception and pain. Both operational and laboratory welfare indicators are detailed for several species which can be evaluated by the tank side or by additional behavioural scoring software and laboratory equipment. Even with this progress over the last 24 years many aspects still need to be uncovered. For efficient pain management for fishes used in science, a wider range of species need to be assessed during invasive procedures; the mechanism of action and pharmacokinetics of pain-relieving drugs must be elucidated so scientists can make informed choices, as well as identifying any possible side-effects; combinatorial strategies where more than one drug is administered at lower doses to reduce side-effects should be investigated; and pain assessment tools using intensity scales or monitoring using artificial intelligence evaluation software provides promise as an aid to identifying pain and allowing researchers to intervene to improve fish welfare.

Laboratory Animals
i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto (PT), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Pain in laboratory fishes: What we know and what we need to know — Lisa Carlsson, Lynne U. Sneddon, et al. · Laboratory Animals (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS