Early Check: The First 5 Years

Evidence of net benefit and feasibility of implementation is necessary for a health condition to become part of routine newborn screening. But acquiring data to support informed decision-making is difficult without a nimble and coordinated research capacity grounded in public health practice, a problem exacerbated in the case of rare disorders. To address this concern, we built and implemented Early Check to test the feasibility of a research resource that could adapt to changing needs for data. During the first 5 years, we (1) built a partnership among an independent scientific research institute, 2 universities, and the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health; (2) developed and evaluated low-touch statewide recruitment approaches and an online consent that met all institutional review board requirements; (3) selected 3 prototypic health conditions to test the system; (4) enrolled and screened nearly 27 000 newborns; and (5) identified 105 screen-positive participants for whom we provided counseling, diagnostic testing, and referral to specialized long-term clinical care for infants with confirmed diagnoses. After this initial phase, we used the same infrastructure to offer whole-genome sequencing at birth for more than 200 disorders. Lessons learned from Early Check and other similar projects will hopefully inform future efforts to build national capacity for newborn screening research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PEDIATRICS
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2026-077357d
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Check: The First 5 Years

Beth Lincoln Boyea, Sara M. Andrews, Kristin Clinard, Manisha Dass et al.
PEDIATRICS
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Early Check: The First 5 Years

Beth Lincoln Boyea, Sara M. Andrews, Kristin Clinard, Manisha Dass, Lisa M. Gehtland, Scott M. Shone, Cynthia M. Powell, Katherine C. Okoniewski, Melissa Raspa, Angela Gwaltney, Emily Cheves, Samantha Scott, Bailey, Anne C. Wheeler, Holly Peay, Heidi Cope, Katerina. S. Kucera, Ana Forsythe, Rebecca B. Wright, Rebecca Moultrie
article en

Abstract

Evidence of net benefit and feasibility of implementation is necessary for a health condition to become part of routine newborn screening. But acquiring data to support informed decision-making is difficult without a nimble and coordinated research capacity grounded in public health practice, a problem exacerbated in the case of rare disorders. To address this concern, we built and implemented Early Check to test the feasibility of a research resource that could adapt to changing needs for data. During the first 5 years, we (1) built a partnership among an independent scientific research institute, 2 universities, and the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health; (2) developed and evaluated low-touch statewide recruitment approaches and an online consent that met all institutional review board requirements; (3) selected 3 prototypic health conditions to test the system; (4) enrolled and screened nearly 27 000 newborns; and (5) identified 105 screen-positive participants for whom we provided counseling, diagnostic testing, and referral to specialized long-term clinical care for infants with confirmed diagnoses. After this initial phase, we used the same infrastructure to offer whole-genome sequencing at birth for more than 200 disorders. Lessons learned from Early Check and other similar projects will hopefully inform future efforts to build national capacity for newborn screening research.

PEDIATRICSVol. 158(Supplement 2)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), RTI International (US), North Carolina Division of Public Health (US)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.