Limited evidence for soil enzyme activities mediating C:N discrepancies between microbial biomass and organic matter in year 145 of a maize‐based agroecosystem experiment

Abstract Soil microbial biomass (MB) generally exhibits a narrower C:N than soil organic matter (SOM), creating a stoichiometric discrepancy hypothesized to be reconciled in part by C‐ and N‐acquiring enzyme activities. We used soils from an at‐equilibrium long‐term experiment to evaluate the degree to which MB C:N plasticity and enzyme activities explained MB–SOM C:N discrepancies among total SOM, particulate organic matter (POM), and mineral‐associated organic matter (MAOM) at 0‐ to 17‐ and 17‐ to 30‐cm depths. MB C:N increased with depth from 8.6 to 11.7, whereas total SOM and MAOM C:N were similar (∼13), and POM maintained higher C:N (∼19–20) between depths. MB C:N was unrelated to total SOM C:N, but increased with MAOM C:N at surface depth and declined with POM C:N at subsurface depth. Residual analyses identified limited relationships between enzyme activities and total SOM or POM C:N discrepancies. MAOM C:N residuals showed more frequent and negative relationships, which did not support enzyme‐mediated reconciliation of stoichiometric discrepancies. In contrast, fertilization‐induced changes in C‐ and N‐acquiring enzyme activities were positively associated, but were more strongly expressed through total N‐acquiring enzyme activity under manure and certain aminopeptidase activities under synthetic fertilization. Overall, our results demonstrate that interpreting MB C:N in maize‐based agroecosystems should consider SOM fractions and exert caution in the selection of soil enzyme activities used to infer limitation, because widely used soil enzyme activity ratios alone (i) provide limited inferences to microbial nutrient limitation and (ii) do not appear to reflect activities of related soil enzymes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Published
2026-08-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.70320
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Limited evidence for soil enzyme activities mediating C:N discrepancies between microbial biomass and organic matter in year 145 of a maize‐based agroecosystem experiment

Rosa Elena Ibarra López, Tianze Song, Andrew J. Margenot, Chammi P. Attanayake et al.
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Limited evidence for soil enzyme activities mediating C:N discrepancies between microbial biomass and organic matter in year 145 of a maize‐based agroecosystem experiment

Rosa Elena Ibarra López, Tianze Song, Andrew J. Margenot, Chammi P. Attanayake, Ezra Moses, Taylor B. Berkshire‐Akers
article en

Abstract

Abstract Soil microbial biomass (MB) generally exhibits a narrower C:N than soil organic matter (SOM), creating a stoichiometric discrepancy hypothesized to be reconciled in part by C‐ and N‐acquiring enzyme activities. We used soils from an at‐equilibrium long‐term experiment to evaluate the degree to which MB C:N plasticity and enzyme activities explained MB–SOM C:N discrepancies among total SOM, particulate organic matter (POM), and mineral‐associated organic matter (MAOM) at 0‐ to 17‐ and 17‐ to 30‐cm depths. MB C:N increased with depth from 8.6 to 11.7, whereas total SOM and MAOM C:N were similar (∼13), and POM maintained higher C:N (∼19–20) between depths. MB C:N was unrelated to total SOM C:N, but increased with MAOM C:N at surface depth and declined with POM C:N at subsurface depth. Residual analyses identified limited relationships between enzyme activities and total SOM or POM C:N discrepancies. MAOM C:N residuals showed more frequent and negative relationships, which did not support enzyme‐mediated reconciliation of stoichiometric discrepancies. In contrast, fertilization‐induced changes in C‐ and N‐acquiring enzyme activities were positively associated, but were more strongly expressed through total N‐acquiring enzyme activity under manure and certain aminopeptidase activities under synthetic fertilization. Overall, our results demonstrate that interpreting MB C:N in maize‐based agroecosystems should consider SOM fractions and exert caution in the selection of soil enzyme activities used to infer limitation, because widely used soil enzyme activity ratios alone (i) provide limited inferences to microbial nutrient limitation and (ii) do not appear to reflect activities of related soil enzymes.

Soil Science Society of America JournalVol. 90(5)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.