Secondary patella resurfacing following primary total knee arthroplasty

Aims: Our aims were to assess joint-specific outcome (JSO), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction following secondary patella resurfacing (SPR), and to define a patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). Methods: This retrospective study was conducted over 16 years (October 2006 to December 2022) and included 182 patients undergoing SPR. Patient demographic details, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, preoperative and postoperative (one year: n = 158 and two years: n = 143) Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EQ-5D, and EQ-VAS scores, as well as postoperative satisfaction, were obtained from a local arthroplasty register. Results: There were clinically meaningful and statistically significant (p < 0.001) improvements in the OKS, with a mean change of 6.8 (95% CI 4.7 to 8.9) and 8.1 (95% CI 5.9 to 10.2) points, and in the EQ-5D of 0.174 (95% CI 0.110 to 0.238) and 0.187 (95% CI 0.119 to 0.255) at both one and two years, respectively. There were 126 (79.7%) and 120 (85.7%) satisfied patients at one and two years, respectively. Prior satisfaction with the index total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (one year only: odds ratio (OR) 10.4 (95% CI 3.10 to 34.85); p < 0.001) and increasing time from primary TKA to the SPR (one year: OR 1.37 (for each additional year) (95% CI 1.03 to 1.81); p = 0.028, and two years: OR 2.32 (95% 1.23 to 4.38); p = 0.009) were independently associated with satisfaction. A 2.5-year threshold provided the optimal cutoff for predicting satisfaction, yielding sensitivities of 66.3% and 70.7% and specificities of 67.9% and 68.8% at one and two years, respectively. Thresholds predicted a PASS in the OKS were 20 and 22 at one and two years, respectively. For EQ-5D, the thresholds were 0.500 at both timepoints, and for EQ-VAS were 60 and 63 at one and two years, respectively. At a median follow-up of ten years, no re-revisions were undertaken, and 52 patients (28.1%) died. Conclusion: SPR was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in JSO and HRQoL, with high levels of patient satisfaction. Prior satisfaction with the index TKA and longer time to SPR were independently associated with satisfaction, with patients undergoing SPR after 2.5 years more likely to be satisfied. The identification PASS thresholds offer benchmarks for evaluating success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Bone & Joint Journal
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.108b9.bjj-2026-0002.r2
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Secondary patella resurfacing following primary total knee arthroplasty

Nardeen Kader, Sarkhell Radha, Nick D. Clement, Irrum Afzal et al.
The Bone & Joint Journal
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Secondary patella resurfacing following primary total knee arthroplasty

Nardeen Kader, Sarkhell Radha, Nick D. Clement, Irrum Afzal, Deiary F. Kader, Ricci Plastow, Thomas Parsons, Thomas Botfield-Gray
article en

Abstract

Aims: Our aims were to assess joint-specific outcome (JSO), health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and patient satisfaction following secondary patella resurfacing (SPR), and to define a patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS). Methods: This retrospective study was conducted over 16 years (October 2006 to December 2022) and included 182 patients undergoing SPR. Patient demographic details, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, preoperative and postoperative (one year: n = 158 and two years: n = 143) Oxford Knee Score (OKS), EQ-5D, and EQ-VAS scores, as well as postoperative satisfaction, were obtained from a local arthroplasty register. Results: There were clinically meaningful and statistically significant (p < 0.001) improvements in the OKS, with a mean change of 6.8 (95% CI 4.7 to 8.9) and 8.1 (95% CI 5.9 to 10.2) points, and in the EQ-5D of 0.174 (95% CI 0.110 to 0.238) and 0.187 (95% CI 0.119 to 0.255) at both one and two years, respectively. There were 126 (79.7%) and 120 (85.7%) satisfied patients at one and two years, respectively. Prior satisfaction with the index total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (one year only: odds ratio (OR) 10.4 (95% CI 3.10 to 34.85); p < 0.001) and increasing time from primary TKA to the SPR (one year: OR 1.37 (for each additional year) (95% CI 1.03 to 1.81); p = 0.028, and two years: OR 2.32 (95% 1.23 to 4.38); p = 0.009) were independently associated with satisfaction. A 2.5-year threshold provided the optimal cutoff for predicting satisfaction, yielding sensitivities of 66.3% and 70.7% and specificities of 67.9% and 68.8% at one and two years, respectively. Thresholds predicted a PASS in the OKS were 20 and 22 at one and two years, respectively. For EQ-5D, the thresholds were 0.500 at both timepoints, and for EQ-VAS were 60 and 63 at one and two years, respectively. At a median follow-up of ten years, no re-revisions were undertaken, and 52 patients (28.1%) died. Conclusion: SPR was associated with clinically meaningful improvements in JSO and HRQoL, with high levels of patient satisfaction. Prior satisfaction with the index TKA and longer time to SPR were independently associated with satisfaction, with patients undergoing SPR after 2.5 years more likely to be satisfied. The identification PASS thresholds offer benchmarks for evaluating success.

The Bone & Joint JournalVol. 108-B(9)
North Bristol NHS Trust (GB), NHS Lothian (GB), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Epsom Hospital (GB), Kingston Hospital (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.