Child Sexual Abuse Victimization Profiles Derived from Court Judgments

Abstract Background/Objective: Child sexual abuse (CSA) encompasses heterogeneous experiences that vary in developmental timing, relational context, sexual intrusiveness, and chronicity, yet these characteristics are often examined separately. These configurations may shape evidentiary challenges and the incorporation of forensic psychological evidence in judicial proceedings. This study aimed to identify CSA profiles and examine their associations with witness statement and psychological injury assessments. Method: We systematically analyzed 446 Spanish court judgments for contact CSA between 2022 and 2025. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify victimization profiles from developmental, relational, and criminological indicators. Logistic regression models and average marginal effects examined between-class differences in assessments documented in the judgments. Results: Four profiles were identified: episodic extrafamilial touching abuse (Class 1; 24%), extrafamilial penetrative abuse (Class 2; 18%), recurrent intrafamilial touching abuse (Class 3; 31%), and chronic intrafamilial penetrative abuse (Class 4; 27%). Relative to Class 1, the predicted probability of a witness statement assessment increased by 15.0, 27.5, and 37.7 percentage points in Classes 2, 3, and 4, respectively. For psychological injury assessments, significant increases were observed only in Classes 3 and 4, amounting to 20.9 and 34.7 percentage points, respectively. Conclusions: CSA characteristics clustered into unique developmental, relational, and criminological configurations. Forensic psychological evidence was more strongly associated with younger victims and recurrent intrafamilial abuse dynamics than with sexual severity alone. These findings support a configuration-based understanding of CSA and underscore the need for evidence-based criteria for incorporating forensic psychological assessments into judicial proceedings. Keywords: latent class; sexual victimization; developmental timing; intrafamilial abuse; child testimony.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22198038
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Child Sexual Abuse Victimization Profiles Derived from Court Judgments

Blanca Cea, Álvaro Montes, Alexander Trinidad, Ramón Arce Fernández
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Child Abuse and Trauma
preprint

Child Sexual Abuse Victimization Profiles Derived from Court Judgments

Blanca Cea, Álvaro Montes, Alexander Trinidad, Ramón Arce Fernández
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background/Objective: Child sexual abuse (CSA) encompasses heterogeneous experiences that vary in developmental timing, relational context, sexual intrusiveness, and chronicity, yet these characteristics are often examined separately. These configurations may shape evidentiary challenges and the incorporation of forensic psychological evidence in judicial proceedings. This study aimed to identify CSA profiles and examine their associations with witness statement and psychological injury assessments. Method: We systematically analyzed 446 Spanish court judgments for contact CSA between 2022 and 2025. Latent class analysis was conducted to identify victimization profiles from developmental, relational, and criminological indicators. Logistic regression models and average marginal effects examined between-class differences in assessments documented in the judgments. Results: Four profiles were identified: episodic extrafamilial touching abuse (Class 1; 24%), extrafamilial penetrative abuse (Class 2; 18%), recurrent intrafamilial touching abuse (Class 3; 31%), and chronic intrafamilial penetrative abuse (Class 4; 27%). Relative to Class 1, the predicted probability of a witness statement assessment increased by 15.0, 27.5, and 37.7 percentage points in Classes 2, 3, and 4, respectively. For psychological injury assessments, significant increases were observed only in Classes 3 and 4, amounting to 20.9 and 34.7 percentage points, respectively. Conclusions: CSA characteristics clustered into unique developmental, relational, and criminological configurations. Forensic psychological evidence was more strongly associated with younger victims and recurrent intrafamilial abuse dynamics than with sexual severity alone. These findings support a configuration-based understanding of CSA and underscore the need for evidence-based criteria for incorporating forensic psychological assessments into judicial proceedings. Keywords: latent class; sexual victimization; developmental timing; intrafamilial abuse; child testimony.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Cologne (DE), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
Gender equality, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.