GENERATIVE AI AND SELF-MEDICATION: RISKS, RELIABILITY, AND PATIENT SAFETY IN THE ERA OF AI-BASED HEALTHCARE

Health-professions students are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) tools, especially large language model (LLM)-based chatbots like ChatGPT, for academic tasks as well as informal drug information retrieval, symptom checking, and self-medication decision-making.[2,9,3,7] Due to their dual roles as future gatekeepers of safe pharmaceutical use, trainees in sciences connected to medicine, and consumers of health information, pharmacy students hold a special place in this conversation.[2,3,20,33,56] In order to describe what is known about pharmacy (and allied health) students' knowledge of AI, their attitudes toward its use in clinical and self-care contexts, and their actual practices—including the use of AI for drug information, dosing guidance, and self-diagnosis-adjacent tasks—this review synthesizes nine cross-sectional Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) studies conducted between 2022 and 2026 across Zambia.[3] Saudi Arabia.[2,6] India.[1,4,8] Syria.[9] Malaysia.[5] and other settings. AI awareness is almost universal (82–100%) in all contexts.[2,3,5,6,8,9] but conceptual understanding of AI subtypes, medical uses, and limitations is generally lower (30–60%).[2,3,5,6,8,9] Concerns concerning data privacy, false information, over-reliance, and professional displacement temper the generally positive attitudes.[1,2,6,7,8] Practice is still limited: formal curricular training is uncommon (7–46%).[2,3,6,7,9] and the majority of self-reported AI use focuses on academic activities (summarizing, presentations, exam preparation) rather than verified clinical decision-support.[3,4,5,7] There is a dearth of direct data on AI-assisted self-diagnosis and self-medication, particularly among pharmacy students. In order to outline the emerging risk landscape and suggest curricular and regulatory responses, this review draws conclusions from related findings, such as the use of ChatGPT for "getting drug information".[2] perceived AI usefulness in "medication management".[1,2] and expressed willingness to trust AI-generated dosing recommendations.[2]

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22160462
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GENERATIVE AI AND SELF-MEDICATION: RISKS, RELIABILITY, AND PATIENT SAFETY IN THE ERA OF AI-BASED HEALTHCARE

*1Dr. Jegathis Kumar M., 2Karthikeyan S., 3Magesh Kumar
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

GENERATIVE AI AND SELF-MEDICATION: RISKS, RELIABILITY, AND PATIENT SAFETY IN THE ERA OF AI-BASED HEALTHCARE

*1Dr. Jegathis Kumar M., 2Karthikeyan S., 3Magesh Kumar
article en

Abstract

Health-professions students are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) tools, especially large language model (LLM)-based chatbots like ChatGPT, for academic tasks as well as informal drug information retrieval, symptom checking, and self-medication decision-making.[2,9,3,7] Due to their dual roles as future gatekeepers of safe pharmaceutical use, trainees in sciences connected to medicine, and consumers of health information, pharmacy students hold a special place in this conversation.[2,3,20,33,56] In order to describe what is known about pharmacy (and allied health) students' knowledge of AI, their attitudes toward its use in clinical and self-care contexts, and their actual practices—including the use of AI for drug information, dosing guidance, and self-diagnosis-adjacent tasks—this review synthesizes nine cross-sectional Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice (KAP) studies conducted between 2022 and 2026 across Zambia.[3] Saudi Arabia.[2,6] India.[1,4,8] Syria.[9] Malaysia.[5] and other settings. AI awareness is almost universal (82–100%) in all contexts.[2,3,5,6,8,9] but conceptual understanding of AI subtypes, medical uses, and limitations is generally lower (30–60%).[2,3,5,6,8,9] Concerns concerning data privacy, false information, over-reliance, and professional displacement temper the generally positive attitudes.[1,2,6,7,8] Practice is still limited: formal curricular training is uncommon (7–46%).[2,3,6,7,9] and the majority of self-reported AI use focuses on academic activities (summarizing, presentations, exam preparation) rather than verified clinical decision-support.[3,4,5,7] There is a dearth of direct data on AI-assisted self-diagnosis and self-medication, particularly among pharmacy students. In order to outline the emerging risk landscape and suggest curricular and regulatory responses, this review draws conclusions from related findings, such as the use of ChatGPT for "getting drug information".[2] perceived AI usefulness in "medication management".[1,2] and expressed willingness to trust AI-generated dosing recommendations.[2]

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.