Ai-Dependent Judgment - How AI Reshapes the Formation and Transfer of Judgment

This paper examines how artificial intelligence changes the formation of judgment inside institutions even when formal decision authority resides with humans. It distinguishes between AI-supported, AI-influenced and AI-shaped judgment, and traces how AI can alter framing, evidence selection, interpretation and recommendation before a human review commences. The paper argues that conventional review structures may therefore preserve accountability in form without preserving substantive independent judgment, particularly as repeated use creates cumulative dependence, unauthorized or poorly observed AI use, and the propagation of framing, analytical and judgment errors across workflows. It proposes a framework for identifying where judgment is actually being formed, how machine influence accumulates, and when human review ceases to provide substantive independence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-08-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22163034
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ai-Dependent Judgment - How AI Reshapes the Formation and Transfer of Judgment

Krishnan Vasudevan Anantha
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Ai-Dependent Judgment - How AI Reshapes the Formation and Transfer of Judgment

Krishnan Vasudevan Anantha
article en

Abstract

This paper examines how artificial intelligence changes the formation of judgment inside institutions even when formal decision authority resides with humans. It distinguishes between AI-supported, AI-influenced and AI-shaped judgment, and traces how AI can alter framing, evidence selection, interpretation and recommendation before a human review commences. The paper argues that conventional review structures may therefore preserve accountability in form without preserving substantive independent judgment, particularly as repeated use creates cumulative dependence, unauthorized or poorly observed AI use, and the propagation of framing, analytical and judgment errors across workflows. It proposes a framework for identifying where judgment is actually being formed, how machine influence accumulates, and when human review ceases to provide substantive independence.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
TeraXion (Canada) (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.