“Gilead Was Meant to Be Fiction”: Medical Dismissal and Reproductive Governance in Online Discussions of Medical Interactions in Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common and debilitating condition, yet women frequently report dismissal and inadequate care. Drawing on feminist theory and critical discourse analysis, this study examines Reddit discussions of medical interactions relating to HMB. Two interlinked discourses were identified: reproductive governance, where fertility is prioritized over women’s well-being, and medical dismissal, where women’s accounts of suffering are minimized or discredited. These discourses produce epistemic injustice by undermining women’s experiential knowledge, whereas online forums function as spaces of validation and resistance. The findings highlight the need for more equitable, patient-centered approaches to menstrual healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Women s Reproductive Health
Published
2026-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2026.2723029
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Gilead Was Meant to Be Fiction”: Medical Dismissal and Reproductive Governance in Online Discussions of Medical Interactions in Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

Emily Young, Heather Kirk
Women s Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

“Gilead Was Meant to Be Fiction”: Medical Dismissal and Reproductive Governance in Online Discussions of Medical Interactions in Heavy Menstrual Bleeding

Emily Young, Heather Kirk
article en

Abstract

Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is a common and debilitating condition, yet women frequently report dismissal and inadequate care. Drawing on feminist theory and critical discourse analysis, this study examines Reddit discussions of medical interactions relating to HMB. Two interlinked discourses were identified: reproductive governance, where fertility is prioritized over women’s well-being, and medical dismissal, where women’s accounts of suffering are minimized or discredited. These discourses produce epistemic injustice by undermining women’s experiential knowledge, whereas online forums function as spaces of validation and resistance. The findings highlight the need for more equitable, patient-centered approaches to menstrual healthcare.

Women s Reproductive Health
Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.