Benchmarking of fast and interpretable UF machine learning potentials

Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have emerged as a powerful alternative to density functional theory (DFT) for molecular dynamics simulations, offering near-DFT accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost. However, many state-of-the-art MLIPs remain computationally demanding and act as black boxes, limiting physical interpretability. In this work, we evaluate the ultra-fast force field (UF 3 ) potential, which employs linear regression with a cubic B-spline basis to represent effective two- and three-body interactions. We show that UF 3 displays accuracy comparable to established models such as GAP, MTP, NNP (Behler–Parrinello), and qSNAP MLIPs. We further investigate the transferability of UF 3 by computing melting points for six elemental systems with potentials fitted without any solid–liquid interface configurations or explicit thermodynamic information about melting. The model reproduces experimental melting points within ∼ 6% for simple metals (Ni, Cu, Li), but substantially underestimates them for Mo and Si and fails to yield a stable potential for Ge, reflecting the limitations of a fixed expansion truncated at the three-body term for systems with strong angular or covalent bonding. We further illustrate how UF 3 ’s spline-based formulation allows direct visualization of the learned interactions, enabling identification of unphysical behavior that black-box approaches often obscure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computational Materials Science
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2026.115112
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking of fast and interpretable UF machine learning potentials

Richard G. Hennig, Sam Dong, Pawan Prakash
Computational Materials Science
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

Benchmarking of fast and interpretable UF machine learning potentials

Richard G. Hennig, Sam Dong, Pawan Prakash
article en

Abstract

Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have emerged as a powerful alternative to density functional theory (DFT) for molecular dynamics simulations, offering near-DFT accuracy at a fraction of the computational cost. However, many state-of-the-art MLIPs remain computationally demanding and act as black boxes, limiting physical interpretability. In this work, we evaluate the ultra-fast force field (UF 3 ) potential, which employs linear regression with a cubic B-spline basis to represent effective two- and three-body interactions. We show that UF 3 displays accuracy comparable to established models such as GAP, MTP, NNP (Behler–Parrinello), and qSNAP MLIPs. We further investigate the transferability of UF 3 by computing melting points for six elemental systems with potentials fitted without any solid–liquid interface configurations or explicit thermodynamic information about melting. The model reproduces experimental melting points within ∼ 6% for simple metals (Ni, Cu, Li), but substantially underestimates them for Mo and Si and fails to yield a stable potential for Ge, reflecting the limitations of a fixed expansion truncated at the three-body term for systems with strong angular or covalent bonding. We further illustrate how UF 3 ’s spline-based formulation allows direct visualization of the learned interactions, enabling identification of unphysical behavior that black-box approaches often obscure.

Computational Materials ScienceVol. 276
University of Florida (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Office of Science, Division of Materials Research, Basic Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.