The spatial politics of International Climate Finance: A case of India

Do political parties shape where International Climate Funds are allocated? We examine this question in the context of India, where International Climate Funds create opportunities for the central government to leverage externally funded resources to advance domestic political interests. Drawing on a novel geo-coded dataset of project locations from the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism, we show that projects are more likely to be allocated to constituencies represented by co-partisans of the Prime Minister’s party, and that this effect is strongest in competitive constituencies within states governed by opposition parties, where the central government has the sharpest incentives to build new support. This is surprising because existing literature on the Clean Development Mechanism suggests that decisions on project allocations are depoliticized. By demonstrating otherwise, this article contributes to the literature on International Climate Funds by demonstrating the importance of domestic politics in shaping its distribution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Studies
Published
2026-09-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217261484352
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The spatial politics of International Climate Finance: A case of India

Matthew Paterson, Soham Banerjee, Dishil; id_orcid 0000-0003-2919-6054 Shrimankar
Political Studies
International Development and Aid
article

The spatial politics of International Climate Finance: A case of India

Matthew Paterson, Soham Banerjee, Dishil; id_orcid 0000-0003-2919-6054 Shrimankar
article en

Abstract

Do political parties shape where International Climate Funds are allocated? We examine this question in the context of India, where International Climate Funds create opportunities for the central government to leverage externally funded resources to advance domestic political interests. Drawing on a novel geo-coded dataset of project locations from the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism, we show that projects are more likely to be allocated to constituencies represented by co-partisans of the Prime Minister’s party, and that this effect is strongest in competitive constituencies within states governed by opposition parties, where the central government has the sharpest incentives to build new support. This is surprising because existing literature on the Clean Development Mechanism suggests that decisions on project allocations are depoliticized. By demonstrating otherwise, this article contributes to the literature on International Climate Funds by demonstrating the importance of domestic politics in shaping its distribution.

Political Studies
University of Manchester (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The spatial politics of International Climate Finance: A case of India — Matthew Paterson, Soham Banerjee, et al. · Political Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS