The impact of magnitude uncertainties and K corrections on standard siren measurements of the Hubble constant

Gravitational-wave standard sirens provide an independent probe of the Hubble constant. Dark siren analyses that rely on galaxy catalogues are sensitive to catalogue-related uncertainties. While incompleteness, weighting schemes, and redshift errors have been studied extensively, the impact of magnitude uncertainties and K corrections has received little attention so far. We assess how magnitude errors and K corrections propagate into the Hubble constant inference, and compare their impact to that of realistic spectroscopic redshift errors to determine their relevance. We used a modified version of the Python package to construct line-of-sight redshift priors from a complete, volume-limited mock galaxy catalogue up to z<0.2. We simulated and analysed a sample of sim200 binary black hole events with luminosity weighting in the B and K bands and tested different uncertainty models for redshifts, magnitudes, and K corrections. gwcosmo The choice of luminosity-weighting scheme has a substantial impact on the inferred Hubble constant posterior, with the direct B- and K-band comparison producing differences comparable to the largest uncertainty-induced changes. Spectroscopic redshift errors produce the largest integrated changes in the Hubble constant posterior among the tested uncertainty treatments. Photometric magnitude uncertainties lead to substantially smaller, band-dependent deviations. In the K band, the tested K-correction treatments have only a minor impact in the present low-redshift mock analysis, with the empirical correction slightly reducing the integrated deviation relative to the no-correction case. Our results show that, for a complete, low-redshift mock catalogue, magnitude uncertainties and K-correction assumptions are subdominant compared to spectroscopic redshift errors, while the luminosity-weighting scheme represents an important modelling choice in catalogue-based dark siren inference. In realistic, flux-limited catalogues with larger localization areas and photometric or mixed redshift errors, the relative impact of magnitude uncertainties is expected to be even smaller, indicating that they need not be prioritized in near-future dark siren analyses.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Published
2026-11-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202659514
Primary Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of magnitude uncertainties and K corrections on standard siren measurements of the Hubble constant

M. Pálfi, Peter Raffai
1 links
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
article

The impact of magnitude uncertainties and K corrections on standard siren measurements of the Hubble constant

M. Pálfi, Peter Raffai
article en

Abstract

Gravitational-wave standard sirens provide an independent probe of the Hubble constant. Dark siren analyses that rely on galaxy catalogues are sensitive to catalogue-related uncertainties. While incompleteness, weighting schemes, and redshift errors have been studied extensively, the impact of magnitude uncertainties and K corrections has received little attention so far. We assess how magnitude errors and K corrections propagate into the Hubble constant inference, and compare their impact to that of realistic spectroscopic redshift errors to determine their relevance. We used a modified version of the Python package to construct line-of-sight redshift priors from a complete, volume-limited mock galaxy catalogue up to z<0.2. We simulated and analysed a sample of sim200 binary black hole events with luminosity weighting in the B and K bands and tested different uncertainty models for redshifts, magnitudes, and K corrections. gwcosmo The choice of luminosity-weighting scheme has a substantial impact on the inferred Hubble constant posterior, with the direct B- and K-band comparison producing differences comparable to the largest uncertainty-induced changes. Spectroscopic redshift errors produce the largest integrated changes in the Hubble constant posterior among the tested uncertainty treatments. Photometric magnitude uncertainties lead to substantially smaller, band-dependent deviations. In the K band, the tested K-correction treatments have only a minor impact in the present low-redshift mock analysis, with the empirical correction slightly reducing the integrated deviation relative to the no-correction case. Our results show that, for a complete, low-redshift mock catalogue, magnitude uncertainties and K-correction assumptions are subdominant compared to spectroscopic redshift errors, while the luminosity-weighting scheme represents an important modelling choice in catalogue-based dark siren inference. In realistic, flux-limited catalogues with larger localization areas and photometric or mixed redshift errors, the relative impact of magnitude uncertainties is expected to be even smaller, indicating that they need not be prioritized in near-future dark siren analyses.

Astronomy and Astrophysics
National Science Foundation, Swinburne University of Technology, Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Nemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs Hivatal, Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon