Impact of USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail on Research Trends among Ophthalmology Residency Applicants

Background: Ophthalmology is a very competitive specialty with a growing number of applicants each academic year. In the past, ophthalmology residency programs used the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 numerical score as a key screening tool to narrow the applicant pool; however, the transition to pass/fail has created uncertainty regarding alternative selection criteria. Purpose: To evaluate ophthalmology residency applications submitted before and after the elimination of the numerical USMLE Step 1 scoring system, with a focus on assessing the volume and quality of research experiences. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective study examining ophthalmology residency applications in the 2019, 2022, and 2024 cycles. Baseline characteristics were compared using t tests, one-way ANOVA tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests and χ2 tests with Bonferroni correction (adjusted significance threshold, p < 0.002). Furthermore, linear regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with total publications, total presentations, presentation: publication ratio and research gap years. Significance was set at a p < 0.05. Results: A total of 284, 361, and 381 applications were analyzed in the 2019, 2022, and 2024 cycles, respectively. All applicants (100%) in the 2019 and 2022 cycles had a numerical USMLE Step 1 score, compared with none (0%) in the 2024 cycle. Between the three application cycles, there was a significant increase in the number of listed research presentations (3.34 vs. 6.22 vs. 8.49 [p < 0.0001]), the presentation: publication ratio (1.56 vs. 2.18 vs. 2.93 [p < 0.0001]) and the number of applicants with a reported USMLE Step 2 score (51.1% vs 72.0% vs 93.2% [p < 0.0001]). The mean number of peer-reviewed publications significantly increased from 1.95 in 2019 to 3.26 in 2022; however, there was no difference between the 2022 and 2024 cycles (3.26 vs. 3.29 [p = 0.9063]). Similarly, there was no difference in average impact factor of the journal of publication (4.71 vs. 4.14 [p = 0.2431]) or annualized citation rate (4.88 vs. 3.13 [p = 0.0267]) between the 2022 and 2024 cycles. On multivariate analysis, having a PhD (p = 0.048), a higher USMLE Step 1 score (p = 0.022), taking a research gap year (p = 0.026) and having more research presentations (p < 0.001) were independently associated with a higher number of overall publications. Conclusions: Ophthalmology residency applicants have shifted towards increasing the volume of research experiences, potentially in response to the elimination of the numerical USMLE Step 1 score.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
Published
2026-08-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62199/2475-4757.1353
Primary Topic
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail on Research Trends among Ophthalmology Residency Applicants

Andrew L. Reynolds, Yousef Yousef, Sinan Ersan, Cameron McGlone et al.
Journal of Academic Ophthalmology
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
article

Impact of USMLE Step 1 Pass/Fail on Research Trends among Ophthalmology Residency Applicants

Andrew L. Reynolds, Yousef Yousef, Sinan Ersan, Cameron McGlone, Charles Zhang, Lydia Lanski, Fahim Ahmad
article en

Abstract

Background: Ophthalmology is a very competitive specialty with a growing number of applicants each academic year. In the past, ophthalmology residency programs used the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) Step 1 numerical score as a key screening tool to narrow the applicant pool; however, the transition to pass/fail has created uncertainty regarding alternative selection criteria. Purpose: To evaluate ophthalmology residency applications submitted before and after the elimination of the numerical USMLE Step 1 scoring system, with a focus on assessing the volume and quality of research experiences. Methods: This is a single institution retrospective study examining ophthalmology residency applications in the 2019, 2022, and 2024 cycles. Baseline characteristics were compared using t tests, one-way ANOVA tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests and χ2 tests with Bonferroni correction (adjusted significance threshold, p < 0.002). Furthermore, linear regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with total publications, total presentations, presentation: publication ratio and research gap years. Significance was set at a p < 0.05. Results: A total of 284, 361, and 381 applications were analyzed in the 2019, 2022, and 2024 cycles, respectively. All applicants (100%) in the 2019 and 2022 cycles had a numerical USMLE Step 1 score, compared with none (0%) in the 2024 cycle. Between the three application cycles, there was a significant increase in the number of listed research presentations (3.34 vs. 6.22 vs. 8.49 [p < 0.0001]), the presentation: publication ratio (1.56 vs. 2.18 vs. 2.93 [p < 0.0001]) and the number of applicants with a reported USMLE Step 2 score (51.1% vs 72.0% vs 93.2% [p < 0.0001]). The mean number of peer-reviewed publications significantly increased from 1.95 in 2019 to 3.26 in 2022; however, there was no difference between the 2022 and 2024 cycles (3.26 vs. 3.29 [p = 0.9063]). Similarly, there was no difference in average impact factor of the journal of publication (4.71 vs. 4.14 [p = 0.2431]) or annualized citation rate (4.88 vs. 3.13 [p = 0.0267]) between the 2022 and 2024 cycles. On multivariate analysis, having a PhD (p = 0.048), a higher USMLE Step 1 score (p = 0.022), taking a research gap year (p = 0.026) and having more research presentations (p < 0.001) were independently associated with a higher number of overall publications. Conclusions: Ophthalmology residency applicants have shifted towards increasing the volume of research experiences, potentially in response to the elimination of the numerical USMLE Step 1 score.

Journal of Academic OphthalmologyVol. 18(2)
University of Miami (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.